Audit committee characteristics: an empirical investigation of the contribution to intellectual capital efficiency
Abstract
Purpose: In a knowledge economy, it is generally agreed that audit committees play a significant role in supporting the overall firm’s knowledge, particularly enhancing the reporting process. In this respect, this paper aims to examine the effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital efficiency. Design/methodology/approach: This study examined 59 banks for five years (2011-2015), obtaining 295 observations. The study’s independent variable is audit committee characteristics. The dependent variable is intellectual capital components (Human: human capital efficiency [HCE]; Structural: structural capital efficiency [SCE]; Relational: relational capital efficiency [RCE]; and Physical/Financial: capital employed efficiency [CEE]). In addition, the study used four bank-specific control variables. Findings: The findings deduced from the empirical results demonstrate that there is a significant positive impact of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital. Moreover, the relationship between audit committee and intellectual capital components (HCE, SCE, RCE and CEE) also has a significant positive relationship if measured individually. Originality/value: The study provides insights about the relationship between audit committee characteristics and the improvement in intellectual capital efficiency, which might be used by firms to re-arrange the roles within audit committee, to reassign internal priorities and to escalate position in their environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study controlled for firm size (SIZE), financial leverage (LEV), and firm age (AGE).
“we controlled for three variables: firm size (SIZE), which was measured by the natural logarithm of total assets; financial leverage (LEV), which was measured by dividing the DMU's total liabilities by its shareholders' equity; and firm age (AGE) as a proxy for learning, which was measured by the natural logarithm of the DMU's age since inception.”
From Does the Efficiency of a Firm's Intellectual Capital and Working Capital Management Affect Its Performance? (2024) · cites this paper as Buallay, 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Buallay, A.
- Affiliations
- Ahlia University (BH)
- Corresponding author
- Buallay, Amina
- ORCID
- Buallay, Amina
- Venue
- Measuring Business Excellence
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-06-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-200
- ISSN
- 1368-3047 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808389308
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Measuring Business Excellence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
- Keywords
- audit committee characteristics, intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, structural capital efficiency, relational capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, banks, corporate governance, knowledge economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review