Cited by 79Intellectual Capital and Performance AnalysisAuditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceCorporate Governance and Financial Management

Audit committee characteristics: an empirical investigation of the contribution to intellectual capital efficiency

Buallay, Amina·2018·Measuring Business Excellence

Abstract

Purpose: In a knowledge economy, it is generally agreed that audit committees play a significant role in supporting the overall firm’s knowledge, particularly enhancing the reporting process. In this respect, this paper aims to examine the effect of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital efficiency. Design/methodology/approach: This study examined 59 banks for five years (2011-2015), obtaining 295 observations. The study’s independent variable is audit committee characteristics. The dependent variable is intellectual capital components (Human: human capital efficiency [HCE]; Structural: structural capital efficiency [SCE]; Relational: relational capital efficiency [RCE]; and Physical/Financial: capital employed efficiency [CEE]). In addition, the study used four bank-specific control variables. Findings: The findings deduced from the empirical results demonstrate that there is a significant positive impact of audit committee characteristics on intellectual capital. Moreover, the relationship between audit committee and intellectual capital components (HCE, SCE, RCE and CEE) also has a significant positive relationship if measured individually. Originality/value: The study provides insights about the relationship between audit committee characteristics and the improvement in intellectual capital efficiency, which might be used by firms to re-arrange the roles within audit committee, to reassign internal priorities and to escalate position in their environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/mbe-09-2017-0064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study controlled for firm size (SIZE), financial leverage (LEV), and firm age (AGE).

    “we controlled for three variables: firm size (SIZE), which was measured by the natural logarithm of total assets; financial leverage (LEV), which was measured by dividing the DMU's total liabilities by its shareholders' equity; and firm age (AGE) as a proxy for learning, which was measured by the natural logarithm of the DMU's age since inception.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 79

Authors
Buallay, A.
Affiliations
Ahlia University (BH)
Corresponding author
Buallay, Amina
Venue
Measuring Business Excellence
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-06-14
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
183-200
ISSN
1368-3047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808389308
Cited by
79
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Measuring Business Excellence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
Keywords
audit committee characteristics, intellectual capital efficiency, human capital efficiency, structural capital efficiency, relational capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, banks, corporate governance, knowledge economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review