The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to advance the knowledge of Circular Business Models (BMs) over linear models by focusing on new dynamics which are unique to developing countries and have mostly been overlooked by contemporary literature; and second, to bring to the fore aspects of human-sphere which are currently under-researched in the circular economy (CE) domain. Therefore, the research explores how collaboration can facilitate the transition of a developing country’s economy through the creation of value from circular BMs and human-sphere. Design/methodology/approach: To fulfill the research objectives, the authors apply natural resource-based view (NRBV) theory to an in-depth case study. The authors draw the data from semi-structured interviews and observations in North African manufacturing companies. Findings: It was found that multi-stakeholder collaboration is pertinent in implementing CE, especially in developing countries. Collaboration between companies, focusing on CE BMs, with other companies/SMEs could lead to technology transfer and organizational learning necessary for resource efficiency (RE) and clean technology (CT) – the basis for CE. The authors propose a model for collaboration as an enabler for CE. Research limitations/implications: The analysis found multi-stakeholder collaboration to be an important antecedent to CE implementation in a developing country context. Furthermore, the authors found multinational companies who implement CE BMs generate a beneficial symbiotic relationship with local businesses. These benefits mainly revolve around technology transfer and organizational learning which is necessary for RE and CT – the basis for CE. Therefore, to advance knowledge and practice in this area, the authors propose a model for collaboration as an enabler for CE. Practical implications: The authors argue for the importance of collaboration in advancing CE practices which can yield tangible benefits for developing economies. Originality/value: This paper helps address the lack of theory driven research in CE. The paper is a pioneer in this research field as it proposes a theoretical framework for collaboration in CE drawing on from NRBV.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm
Hart, S. L. (1995) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033 · Cited by 5,174
Case research in operations management
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210414329 · Cited by 2,963
Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008 · Cited by 2,049
Invited Editorial: A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm: Fifteen Years After
Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310390219 · Cited by 1,854
Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.11.030 · Cited by 1,695
Govindan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead
Ferasso, M., Beliaeva, T., Kraus, S., Clauss, T., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2554 · Cited by 588
Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: where we are now, and where we are heading
Hina, M., Chauhan, C., Kaur, P., Kraus, S., & Dhir, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049 · Cited by 366
A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy: digital functions and mechanisms
Liu, Q., Trevisan, A. H., Yang, M., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3015 · Cited by 324
A systematic review on barriers and enablers toward circular procurement management
Qazi, A. A., & Appolloni, A. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.013 · Cited by 126
Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers
Seles, B. M. R. P., Mascarenhas, J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., & Trevisan, A. H. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2985 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishra, J. L., Chiwenga, K. D., & Ali, K.
- Venue
- Management Decision
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-04-02
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1784-1800
- ISSN
- 0025-1747 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2932701474
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 28.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/md-10-2018-1111
- The paper
- Mishra, J. L., Chiwenga, K. D., & Ali, K. (2021). Collaboration as an enabler for circular economy: a case study of a developing country. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-10-2018-1111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.