The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated reporting and integrated thinking in Italian public sector organisations
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to explore the linkages between integrated reporting (IR) and organisations’ internal processes, specifically focusing on investigating the internal mechanisms of change that can lead organisations to adopt IR disclosure and how this impacts on integrated thinking internally. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws upon previous analysis and insights provided in the IR academic literature, as well as analysing several directives, policy and framework pronouncements. The study also draws on the management accounting change literature, using it as a lens to observe early adopters’ practice. In addition, it provides detailed case studies considering the internal processes of change in five early adopters of the integrated reporting framework (<IRF>) and whether the adoption leads to internal “integrated thinking”. Five Italian public sector organisations are analysed, and the authors make use of official documents, press releases and in-depth semi-structured interviews with the major internal actors. Findings: The research highlights that the processes of change in organisations adopting IR is their adoption of a way of thinking, that is, integrated thinking, as a result of the process of internalisation. Research limitations/implications: Given the short history of IR, this sample is small due to the small number of early adopters. Originality/value: The paper provides academics and policymakers with insights into the process of change to be considered while adopting the <IRF> and responds to calls in the IR literature for further field-based studies on IR’s impact on internal processes. Also, the paper highlights that the European Directive on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information (2014/95/EU) has the potential to increase environmental, social and governance disclosures amongst European companies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory
Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.783668 · Cited by 588
Cited by
Evaluating the integrated reporting journey: insights, gaps and agendas for future research
Rinaldi, L., Unerman, J., & de Villiers, C. (2018) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-04-2018-3446 · Cited by 282
Nicolò, G., Zanellato, G., & Tiron-Tudor, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051908 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Guthrie, J., Manes-Rossi, F., & Orelli, R. L.
- Venue
- Meditari Accountancy Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-573
- ISSN
- 1022-2529 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-372X
- OpenAlex
- W2749125172
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 48.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated reporting and integrated thinking in Italian public sector organisations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/medar-06-2017-0155
- The paper
- Guthrie, J., Manes-Rossi, F., & Orelli, R. L. (2017). Integrated reporting and integrated thinking in Italian public sector organisations. Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-06-2017-0155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.