The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Industry 4.0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance?
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigates the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on green innovation performance. In this relationship, the mediating role of green innovation behavior is also studied. Moreover, open innovation is tested as a mediator between Industry 4.0 technologies and green innovation behavior. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative research method is adopted in which a structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 217 manufacturing firms of Malaysia. After collecting data, the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique is applied to analyze data and test the hypothesis of study. Findings: It is found that Industry 4.0 positively impacts open innovation which leads to green innovation behavior. Also, the former lays positive impact on green innovation behavior which leads to improve green innovation performance. Research limitations/implications: The authors conclude that Industry 4.0 technologies can play an important role to improve green innovation performance of Malaysian manufacturing firms by managing open innovation for green innovation behavior which further improves the green innovation performance. In this context, it is recommended that strategists and policymakers should undertake the role of open innovation and Industry 4.0 technologies to promote environment-friendly innovations and to promote the green behavior in companies. The authors suggest hereby that firms should be given incentives to adopt and utilize Industry 4.0 technologies and collaborative innovation interactions – as they foster a climate for sustainable green innovations (which is also a key component to achieve competitive advantage) and a growing concern nowadays. Practical implications: First of all the research contributes to achieving the broader of United Nations to promote sustainable innovation through green innovations. Moreover, the companies can also incorporate the findings and insights of this study while devising their policies to foster green innovations. Originality/value: This research has done the novel contribution by bridging the gap between open innovation approach and sustainability fields while promoting green innovations in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). These two research fields are rarely studied in previous studies by focusing open innovation particularly. Hence, the authors suggest researchers to undertake these fields to further enhance the level of scholarship between innovation management and sustainability. Also, the authors recommend considering technological orientation and technological absorptive capacity of firms to improve green innovations. The current study has investigated the SMEs perspective in general irrespective to their sectoral differences, thus, for future researchers the authors suggest investigating the sector-wise comparison, i.e. electrical and electronics sector, chemical sector, etc.; or service and manufacturing sector differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Internet of Things: A survey
Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · Cited by 15,613
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · Cited by 2,684
Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability
Ghobakhloo, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869 · Cited by 2,115
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,723
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910297506 · Cited by 1,611
Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms
De Marchi, V. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002 · Cited by 1,284
Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing Systems
Alcácer, V., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2019) · Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.006 · Cited by 1,063
Cited by
Digital Transformation, Board Diversity, and Corporate Sustainable Development
Zhang, C., Tian, X., Sun, X., Xu, J., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16177788 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Mubarak, M. F., Tiwari, S., Petraite, M., Mubarik, M., & Raja Mohd Rasi, R. Z.
- Venue
- Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-06-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1007-1022
- ISSN
- 1477-7835 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3172890433
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 34.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Industry 4.0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/meq-11-2020-0266
- The paper
- Mubarak, M. F., Tiwari, S., Petraite, M., Mubarik, M., & Raja Mohd Rasi, R. Z. (2021). How Industry 4.0 technologies and open innovation can improve green innovation performance? Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-11-2020-0266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.