Cited by 80Employee Performance and LeadershipEmployee Performance and ManagementLeadership and Management in Organizations

Democratic leadership and organizational performance: the moderating effect of contingent reward

Hilton, Sam Kris, Arkorful, Helen, Martins, Albert·2021·Management Research Review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the moderating effect of contingent reward on the relationship between democratic leadership and organizational performance. Design/methodology/approach: Explanatory and cross-sectional survey designs were used. A quantitative research approach was also adopted to collect the data from 476 employees in the telecommunication industry. Using statistics package for social science, the data was analyzed via descriptive statistics, correlation and hierarchical regression techniques. Findings: The results reveal that both democratic leadership and contingent reward have a significant positive relationship with organizational performance. Furthermore, contingent reward significantly augments and moderates the relationship between democratic leadership and organizational performance. Thus, the combination of democratic leadership and contingent reward would more likely produce higher organizational performance. Originality/value: This study has made a significant contribution to leadership and organizational literature by establishing the effectiveness of contingent reward as a moderator on the relationship between democratic leadership and organizational performance in a telecommunication industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/mrr-04-2020-0237

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hilton, S. K., Arkorful, H., & Martins, A.
Affiliations
University of Professional Studies (GH)
Venue
Management Research Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-02-05
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
1042-1058
ISSN
2040-8269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130656122
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
12.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Research Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
Keywords
democratic leadership, contingent reward, organizational performance, moderating effect, telecommunications industry, employee performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review