The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Food packaging design and consumer perception of the product quality, safety, healthiness and preference
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of the packaging design on consumers’ perception of the food quality, safety, healthiness and preference to buy. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional study recruited a convenience sample of 547 Lebanese adults with a median age of 30 years old and 54% being females, between November and December 2016, using an interviewer-based questionnaire. Findings As identified by the participants, packaging should “protect the food” (54.9%) and be safe (52%). Most participants especially those who reported that protecting the food is the most important packaging functionality tended to select the vacuum package [OR (95% CI) = 2.19 (1.32; 3.66); p = 0.002] for having the highest quality, being the healthiest and the more frequently bought (24.3, 30.2 and 29.1% respectively). Regarding the juice, most of the participants thought that the glass bottles have the highest quality, were the safest, the healthiest and the most frequently bought (64.9, 37.4, 68.4 and 52.9%, respectively). Those who reported that safety is the most important characteristic for food packaging, have selected transparent as the most attractive color to use [OR (95% CI) = 2.10 (1.25; 3.55); p-value = 0.005]. Among the consumers, 87% considered that nutrition and health claims were among the most important informative cues. Around 73.1% (n = 399) were willing to pay more for a better packaging with 59.4% willing to pay 3% more. Originality/value This market research identifies the packaging characteristics and features which have positive effects on consumer attitudes. Therefore, it will help manufacturers track consumers’ trends and interests, and accordingly impact their business decisions in responding adequately in their package design. The social behavior will increase the product sale and its market success leading to direct economic implications.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While the primary role for packaging is to protect the enclosed product, there are other factors affecting the packaging quality and user experience which are also linked to waste generation (Bou-Mitri et al., 2021).”
From Packaging design for the circular economy: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as Bou-Mitri et al., 2021
Citations
Cites
Food Packaging—Roles, Materials, and Environmental Issues
Marsh, K. S., & Bugusu, B. A. (2007) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x · Cited by 2,113
Consumers' willingness to pay for organic food
Krystallis, A., & Chryssohoidis, G. (2005) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070700510596901 · Cited by 660
Active and intelligent food packaging: Legal aspects and safety concerns
Dainelli, D., Gontard, N., Spyropoulos, D., Zondervan-van den Beuken, E., & Tobback, P. (2008) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.011 · Cited by 565
Steenis, N. D., van Herpen, E., van der Lans, I. A., Ligthart, T. N., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.036 · Cited by 493
Communicating packaging eco-friendliness
Magnier, L., & Crié, D. (2015) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/ijrdm-04-2014-0048 · Cited by 327
Lindh, H., Olsson, A., & Williams, H. (2015) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.2184 · Cited by 317
Clement, J., Kristensen, T., & Grønhaug, K. (2013) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.01.003 · Cited by 314
Packaging and Proenvironmental Consumption Behavior
van Birgelen, M., Semeijn, J., & Keicher, M. (2008) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916507311140 · Cited by 301
Mai, R., Symmank, C., & Seeberg-Elverfeldt, B. (2016) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.08.002 · Cited by 245
Tijssen, I., Zandstra, E. H., de Graaf, C., & Jager, G. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.01.019 · Cited by 170
Gaining competitive advantage from packaging and labelling in marketing communications
Nancarrow, C., Wright, L. T., & Brace, I. (1998) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070709810204101 · Cited by 151
What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging
Stoll, M., Baecke, S., & Kenning, P. H. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.256 · Cited by 146
Ellison, B., Duff, B. R. L., Wang, Z., & White, T. B. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.013 · Cited by 134
Eldesouky, A., Pulido, A. F., & Díaz, F. J. M. (2015) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12162 · Cited by 132
Strategic Use of Colour in Brand Packaging
Kauppinen‐Räisänen, H. (2014) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.2061 · Cited by 129
What’s in it for me? Food packaging and consumer responses, a focus group study
Fernqvist, F., Olsson, A., & Spendrup, S. (2015) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-08-2013-0224 · Cited by 117
Human Risk Assessment of Endocrine‐Disrupting Chemicals Derived from Plastic Food Containers
Bang, D. Y., Kyung, M., Kim, M. J., Jung, B. Y., Cho, M. C., Choi, S. M., Kim, Y. W., Lim, S. K., Lim, D. S., Won, A. J., et al. (2012) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00197.x · Cited by 115
Requirements for packaging from an ageing consumer's perspective
Duizer, L. M., Robertson, T., & Han, J. (2008) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.834 · Cited by 104
Healthy package, healthy product? Effects of packaging design as a function of purchase setting
van Rompay, T. J. L., Deterink, F., & Fenko, A. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.06.001 · Cited by 99
The importance of packaging in purchase and usage behaviour
Gómez, M., Martín‐Consuegra, D., & Molina, A. (2015) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12168 · Cited by 92
Packaging development: A conceptual framework for identifying new product opportunities
Simms, C., & Trott, P. (2010) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593110382826 · Cited by 87
Understanding the buying behaviour of young consumers regarding packaging attributes and labels
Aday, M. S., & Yener, U. (2014) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12105 · Cited by 71
A qualitative study of children’s snack food packaging perceptions and preferences
Letona, P., Chacón, V., Roberto, C. A., & Barnoya, J. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1274 · Cited by 61
Shen, M., Shi, L., & Gao, Z. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.004 · Cited by 54
Consumer preferences regarding food quality labels: the case of Czechia
Sadílek, T. (2019) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-03-2019-0150 · Cited by 50
Consumers’ perception of usability of product packaging and impulse buying
Bahrainizad, M., & رجبی, آ. (2018) · Journal of Islamic marketing · doi:10.1108/jima-04-2016-0030 · Cited by 48
European consumer response to packaging technologies for improved beef safety
Wezemael, L. V., Ueland, Ø., & Verbeke, W. (2011) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.03.019 · Cited by 39
The influence of packaging on consumers’ quality perception of carrots
Olesen, S. N., & Giacalone, D. (2018) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/joss.12310 · Cited by 37
Boluda, I. K., López, N. V., & Sarabia, F. (2019) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.051 · Cited by 36
Quantification of sensory difference thresholds for fat and sweetness in dairy-based emulsions
Hoppert, K., Zahn, S., Puschmann, A., Ullmann, I., & Rohm, H. (2012) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.008 · Cited by 35
Świda, J., Halagarda, M., & Popek, S. (2018) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12427 · Cited by 34
DECISION MODEL BASED ON TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM) FOR ONLINE SHOP CONSUMERS IN INDONESIA
Suleman, D., Zuniarti, I., Sabil, Setyaningsih, E. D., Yanti, V. A., Susilowati, I. H., Sari, I., Marwansyah, S., Hadi, S. S., & Lestiningsih, A. S. (2019) · Academy of Marketing Studies journal · Cited by 31
The Effect of Colour Contrast on Consumers' Attentive Behaviours and Perception of Fresh Produce
Bix, L., Seo, W., & Sundar, R. P. (2012) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.1972 · Cited by 28
Lidón, I., Rebollar, R., Gil‐Pérez, I., et al. (2018) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.2407 · Cited by 28
Usage and understanding of food labels among L ebanese shoppers
Hassan, H. F., & Dimassi, H. I. (2017) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12368 · Cited by 25
López, N. V., & Boluda, I. K. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.04.012 · Cited by 23
Does Packaging Influence Purchase Decisions of Food Products? a Study of Young Consumers of India
Kapoor, S., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Academy of Marketing Studies journal · Cited by 21
Designing a packaging to promote healthy and low-fat foods: Adolescents versus young-adults
López, N. V., Boluda, I. K., & Sarabia-Sánchez, F. J. (2017) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2017.06.063 · Cited by 15
Scarpi, D., Pizzi, G., & Pichierri, M. (2018) · Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing · doi:10.1080/08974438.2018.1482586 · Cited by 14
Food Packaging Technology and its Emerging Trends: A Review
Ayoub, A., Hameed, F., & Bandral, J. D. (2018) · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.390 · Cited by 10
Rebouças, M. C., Rodrigues, M. D. C. P., & de Freitas, S. M. (2019) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/nfs-11-2018-0309 · Cited by 10
Salmonella: A Common Contaminant of Chicken Shawarma in RasBeirut Restaurants
Banna, H., & Nawas, T. (2016) · IOSR Journal of Environmental Science Toxicology and Food Technology · doi:10.9790/2402-1008011922 · Cited by 8
Consumers’ exposure to claims on pre-packed bread: the case of a developing country, Lebanon
Bou‐Mitri, C., Khnaisser, L., Ghanem, M. B., Merhi, S., Fares, J. E. H., Doumit, J., & Farhat, A. G. (2020) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/nfs-08-2019-0273 · Cited by 8
Self-citationInfluence of packaging on taste perception.
Tecău, A. S., & Chițu, I. B. (2018) · Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Series V Economic Sciences · Cited by 4
Khara, R., & Lakhani, S. J. (2018) · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences · doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.393 · Cited by 2
Basu, J., Datta, S., & Bagchi, L. (2016) · IOSR Journal of Environmental Science Toxicology and Food Technology · doi:10.9790/2402-1009021925 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2017, Customer perception and preference on product packaging, International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 9, 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Packaging design for the circular economy: A systematic review
Zhu, Z., Liu, W., Ye, S., & Batista, L. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.06.005 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Bou-Mitri, C., Abdessater, M., Zgheib, H., & Akiki, Z.
- Affiliations
- Notre Dame University – Louaize (LB)
- Institut National de Santé Publique, d'Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban (LB)
- ORCID
- Akiki, Zeina
- Venue
- Nutrition & Food Science
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 0034-6659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023879498
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 14.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition & Food Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Keywords
- food packaging design, consumer perception, food quality perception, food safety, perceived healthiness, purchase intention, packaging functions, vacuum packaging, glass bottles, packaging color, nutrition and health claims, willingness to pay, Lebanese consumers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review