Development of a safe food handling knowledge questionnaire: psychometric properties and acceptability among consumers
Abstract
Purpose Foodborne illness remains high globally, with the majority of cases occurring in the domestic environment. Research in the safe food-handling domain is limited by the absence of an up-to-date and suitable measure of safe food-handling knowledge for use among consumers, with previous measures limited by questionnaire design features that increase participant burden and burnout and a lack of alignment with current safe food-handling guidelines. The purpose of this study is to develop a safe food-handling knowledge measure to capture a comprehensive understanding of consumers’ safe food-handling knowledge while minimising participant burden and burnout. Design/methodology/approach Items were developed and evaluated prior to administering them to participants. Data was collected among 277 participants who completed the measure online. Findings Results indicated that the measure had good acceptability among participants in the sample (mean = 5.44, SD = 0.77, range = 2.42–7) and that the measure had acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.60), item discrimination and item difficulty. These findings suggest that the safe food-handling knowledge measure would be suitable for use in future studies examining consumer safe food-handling. Originality/value This study provides an updated, acceptable and suitable safe food-handling knowledge measure for use among consumers to better understand consumers’ understanding of safe food-handling practices. Use of this measure in future…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study's questionnaire selection was based on a review of existing literature on food safety at home and guidelines from global health organizations.
“The selection of the questions was based on a review of existing literature on the development of questionnaires to evaluate food safety at home [19–21] as well as guidelines provided by global health organizations [22,23].”
From Assessing food safety practices and foodborne illness risk factors in Brazilian households. (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Considine, J., Botti, M. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2005) · Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia · doi:10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60478-3 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Asking questions changes behavior: Mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation.
Godin, G., Sheeran, P., Conner, M. T., & Germain, M. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.2.179 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Development and validation of a short, consumer-oriented nutrition knowledge questionnaire
Dickson‐Spillmann, M., Siegrist, M., & Keller, C. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.01.034 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Predicting adolescents' safe food handling using an extended theory of planned behavior
Mullan, B. A., Wong, C. L., & Kothe, E. J. (2012) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.10.027 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Self-citationFood safety knowledge, attitude and food handling practices of students
Şanlıer, N., & Konaklıoğlu, E. (2012) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701211219504 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to design a food hygiene intervention
Mullan, B., & Wong, C. (2010) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.04.026 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment and Implementation of a Food Safety Knowledge Instrument
Byrd‐Bredbenner, C., Wheatley, V. M., Schaffner, D. W., Bruhn, C., Blalock, L. L., & Maurer, J. (2007) · Journal of Food Science Education · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4329.2007.00029.x · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Taib, F., & Yusoff, M. S. B. (2014) · Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.12.002 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Multiple-choice questions: Tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online.
Xu, X., Kauer, S. D., & Tupy, S. (2016) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology · doi:10.1037/stl0000062 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Consumer knowledge, risk perception and food-handling behaviors – A national survey in China
Wang, M., Huang, L., Xia, L., & Bai, L. (2020) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107789 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Food hygiene knowledge in adolescents and young adults
Mullan, B. A., Wong, C. L., Todd, J., Davis, E., & Kothe, E. J. (2015) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-03-2013-0060 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating deaths from foodborne disease in the UK for 11 key pathogens
Holland, D., Thomson, L., Mahmoudzadeh, N., & Khaled, A. (2020) · BMJ Open Gastroenterology · doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000377 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Writing Multiple-Choice Questions
BOLAND, R. J., Lester, N. A., & Williams, E. (2010) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ap.34.4.310 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Quick, V., Corda, K. W., Chamberlin, B., Schaffner, D. W., & Byrd‐Bredbenner, C. (2013) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701311331481 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Foodborne Disease Estimates for the United Kingdom in 2018
Holland, D., & Mahmoudzadeh, N. (2020) · doi:10.46756/sci.fsa.squ824 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Evaluation of different food safety education interventions
Feng, Y., Bruhn, C., & Marx, D. (2016) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-10-2015-0372 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Sterniša, M., Možina, S. S., Levstek, S., Kukec, A., Raspor, P., & Jevšnik, M. (2018) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-06-2017-0360 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Investigating the predictors of safe food handling among parents of young children in the USA
Charlesworth, J., Mullan, B. A., & Moran, A. (2021) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108015 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationDeterminants of safe food handling behaviors among middle school youth
Quick, V., Byrd‐Bredbenner, C., & Corda, K. W. (2013) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/nfs-08-2012-0086 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge and Behaviors of Cancer Patients Receiving Treatment
Paden, H., Hatsu, I. E., Kane, K., Lustberg, M. B., Grenade, C., Bhatt, A. D., Diaz, D. A., Beery, A., & Ilić, S. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11081897 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Charlesworth, J., Mullan, B. A., Howell, J. A., Tan, H., Abbott, B., & Potter, A. S. (2021) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108070 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationHan, C. Y., Zheng, X., Lee, L. F., Chan, C. G. B., Lee, Y. Q., Zailani, N. A., Ng, K. W., & Bhaskaran, K. (2019) · Nutrition & Dietetics · doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12513 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Preconception Health Knowledge Questionnaire
Cairncross, Z. F., Dennis, C., Brennenstuhl, S., Ravindran, S., Enders, J., Graves, L. E., Mill, C., Telner, D., & Brown, H. K. (2020) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.1177/0890117120946682 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Seniors, and their food handlers and caregivers, need food safety and nutrition education
Blackburn, M. L., Bruhn, C., Miller, L. M. S., Ganthavorn, C., & Ober, B. A. (2014) · California Agriculture · doi:10.3733/ca.v068n01p30 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Charlesworth, J., Breare, H., Mullan, B. A., Tan, H., & Abbott, B. (2022) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109285 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationSalim, M. N. H. M., Azinuddin, M., Zain, W. M. A. W. M., Shariffuddin, N. S. M., Ibrahim, M. A., & Zainul, N. H. (2024) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2024.2380121 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Examining the long-term effects of a safe food-handling media campaign
Charlesworth, J., Liddelow, C., Mullan, B. A., Tan, H., & Abbott, B. (2023) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.109690 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCharlesworth, J., Rowland, O., & Mullan, B. A. (2023) · Nutrition & Food Science · doi:10.1108/nfs-01-2023-0013 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCharlesworth, J., & Mullan, B. A. (2023) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods12173297 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessing food safety practices and foodborne illness risk factors in Brazilian households.
Fernandes Viana, G. G., Arruda, A. G., & Marques Rossi, G. A. (2025) · PloS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325070 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Charlesworth, J., Mullan, B., & Preece, D.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Venue
- Nutrition & Food Science
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2022-04-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0034-6659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224115386
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nutrition & Food Science (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- safe food handling, food safety knowledge, questionnaire development, psychometric properties, consumer acceptance, participant burden, food poisoning, food safety guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review