To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: – Hicks et al.(2015) have formulated the so-called Leiden manifesto, in which they have assembled the ten principles for a meaningful evaluation of research on the basis of bibliometric data. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach: – In this work the attempt is made to indicate the relevance of the Leiden manifesto for altmetrics. Findings: – As shown by the discussion of the ten principles against the background of the knowledge about and the research into altmetrics, the principles also have a great importance for altmetrics and should be taken into account in their application. Originality/value: – Altmetrics is already frequently used in the area of research evaluation. Thus, it is important that the user of altmetrics data knows the relevance of the Leiden manifesto also in this area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 10 principles of the Leiden Manifesto also apply to the use of altmetrics to measure academic impact.
“Bornmann (2016) suggests that the 10 principles of the Leiden Manifesto, originally written to address citation-based metrics, also apply to the use of altmetrics to measure academic impact [22].”
From Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
The 10 principles of the Leiden Manifesto also apply to the use of altmetrics to measure academic impact.
“Bornmann (2016) suggests that the 10 principles of the Leiden Manifesto, originally written to address citation-based metrics, also apply to the use of altmetrics to measure academic impact [22].”
From Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017) · cites this paper as Bornmann (2016)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research (DE)
- Venue
- Online Information Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-08-08
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 529-543
- ISSN
- 1468-4527 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2300777861
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Online Information Review (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
- Keywords
- Leiden Manifesto, altmetrics, research evaluation, bibliometric data, research impact assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review