An ROI-based review of HR analytics: practical implementation tools
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a return on investment (ROI) based review of human resources (HR) analytics. The objectives of this paper are twofold: first, to offer an integrative analysis of the literature on the topic of HR analytics in order to provide scholars and practitioners a comprehensive yet practical ROI-based view on the topic; second, to provide practical implementation tools in order to assist decision makers concerning questions of whether and in which format to implement HR analytics by highlighting specific directions as to where the expected ROI may be found. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a review paper in which a four-step review and analysis methodology is implemented. Findings Study results indicate that empirical and conceptual studies in HR analytics generate higher ROI compared to technical- and case-based studies. Additionally, study results indicate that workforce planning and recruitment and selection are two HR tasks, which yield the highest ROI. Practical implications The results of this study provide practical information for HR professionals aiming to adopt HR analytics. The ROI-based approach to HR analytics presented in this study provides a robust tool to compare and contrast different dilemma and associated value that can be derived from conducting the various types of HR analytics projects. Originality/value A framework is presented that aggregates the findings and clarifies how various HR analytics tools influ…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a lack of quantitative information describing the organizational mechanisms through which HR analytics influence financial results.
“As a result, there is a lack of quantitative information that describes the organizational mechanisms through which HR analytics influence financial results (Ben-Gal, 2019).”
From HR Analytics and Financial Performance: A Quantitative Study of Capability, Integration, and Data-Driven Decision-Making (2026) · cites this paper as Ben-Gal, 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 92 · Cited by 174
- Authors
- Chalutz Ben-Gal, H.
- Venue
- Personnel Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-09-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1429-1448
- ISSN
- 0048-3486 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2968471090
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 16.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Keywords
- HR analytics, return on investment, workforce planning, recruitment and selection, HR decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review