Cited by 174AI and HR TechnologiesEmployer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource and Talent Management

An ROI-based review of HR analytics: practical implementation tools

Chalutz Ben-Gal, Hila·2019·Personnel Review

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide a return on investment (ROI) based review of human resources (HR) analytics. The objectives of this paper are twofold: first, to offer an integrative analysis of the literature on the topic of HR analytics in order to provide scholars and practitioners a comprehensive yet practical ROI-based view on the topic; second, to provide practical implementation tools in order to assist decision makers concerning questions of whether and in which format to implement HR analytics by highlighting specific directions as to where the expected ROI may be found. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a review paper in which a four-step review and analysis methodology is implemented. Findings Study results indicate that empirical and conceptual studies in HR analytics generate higher ROI compared to technical- and case-based studies. Additionally, study results indicate that workforce planning and recruitment and selection are two HR tasks, which yield the highest ROI. Practical implications The results of this study provide practical information for HR professionals aiming to adopt HR analytics. The ROI-based approach to HR analytics presented in this study provides a robust tool to compare and contrast different dilemma and associated value that can be derived from conducting the various types of HR analytics projects. Originality/value A framework is presented that aggregates the findings and clarifies how various HR analytics tools influ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/pr-11-2017-0362

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 92 · Cited by 174

Authors
Chalutz Ben-Gal, H.
Venue
Personnel Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-09-02
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1429-1448
ISSN
0048-3486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968471090
Cited by
174
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
16.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personnel Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
HR analytics, return on investment, workforce planning, recruitment and selection, HR decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review