The moderation effect of gender on accepting electronic payment technology: a study on United Arab Emirates consumers
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to investigate if perceived security, trust and perceived privacy affect both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Also, the study explores if trust, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use influence consumers’ intentions to use the e-payment system which is supported by testing the moderation effect of gender on the intention to use such systems in the higher education institutes. Design/methodology/approach In total, 850 participants from United Arab Emirates (UAE) universities have filled an online questionnaire prepared for these aims. The survey instrument is composed of 22 items. The primary data was used to test the study model, proposed constructs and the study hypotheses using the Smart PLS Software. Findings The research confirmed that perceived security, trust and perceived privacy affect both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Also, the study found that trust, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use have anticipated the significance of consumers’ intention to use e-payment system which is found also moderated by gender. Research outcomes indicated an important contribution towards the acceptance of e-payment systems and the common design of e-commerce systems. Originality/value Research outcomes have indicated an important contribution toward the acceptance of e-payment systems and the common design of e-commerce systems. Additionally, this study helped in increasing the reader’s understanding of variou…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Determining sample size for research activities
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000308 · Cited by 18,930 · see citing works
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635 · see citing works
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650284 · Cited by 4,944 · see citing works
AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE
MORRIS, M. G., & VENKATESH, V. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x · Cited by 1,723 · see citing works
Cashless Transactions: A Study on Intention and Adoption of e-Wallets
Yang, M., Mamun, A. A., Mohiuddin, M., Nawi, N. C., & Zainol, N. R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020831 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Factors influencing adoption of e-payment systems: an empirical study on Iranian customers
Barkhordari, M., Nourollah, Z., Mashayekhi, H., Mashayekhi, Y., & Ahangar, M. S. (2017) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-016-0311-1 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Facilitating the adoption of e-payment systems: theoretical constructs and empirical analysis.
Özkan, S., Bindusara, G., & Hackney, R. (2010) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/17410391011036085 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consumer Trust and Adoption of Digital Payment Systems in Emerging Markets
Emini, A., Budić, H., & Volarević, H. (2026) · Business Systems Research Journal · doi:10.2478/bsrj-2026-0001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alshurideh, M. T., Al Kurdi, B., Masa’deh, R., & Salloum, S. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Jordan (JO)
- University of Sharjah (AE)
- Venue
- Review of International Business and Strategy
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-02-15
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 375-396
- ISSN
- 2059-6014 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3131249154
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 35.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of International Business and Strategy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- digital payments, technology acceptance, gender differences, perceived security, trust, perceived privacy, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, intention to use, university students, e-commerce
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review