Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th edition)

·2014·Reference Reviews

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/rr-10-2013-0256

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Frances, A. (2013), Essentials of Psychiatric Diagnosis: Responding to the Challenge of DSM-5, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
  2. 2010, Review: diagnosis and assessment, Journal of Mental Health, 19, 396, 10.3109/09638237.2010.493568 · DOI
  3. 2012, Review: space, place and mental health, Journal of Mental Health, 21, 422
  4. Paris, J. (2013), The Intelligent Clinician's Guide to DSM-5, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. · DOI

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Venue
Reference Reviews
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-03-11
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
36-37
ISSN
0950-4125 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1499713768
Cited by
276
References
0
FWCI
103.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th edition). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/rr-10-2013-0256
The paper
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th edition). (2014). Reference Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1108/rr-10-2013-0256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.