The writing superiority effect in the verbal recall of knowledge: sources and determinants
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The time pressure and cognitive burden of outputting oral language is heavier than that of writing.
“The time pressure and cognitive burden of outputting oral language (on-line processing) is heavier than that of writing (off-line processing) (Grabowski, 2007).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Grabowski, 2007
The cognitive load of writing is lower than that of speaking.
“Therefore, the cognitive load of writing is lower than that of speaking (Towell et al., 1996; Grabowski, 2007).”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Grabowski, 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The time pressure and cognitive burden of outputting oral language (on-line processing) is heavier than that of writing (off-line processing) (Grabowski, 2007).”
Background
- Authors
- Grabowski, J.
- Corresponding author
- Grabowski, Joachim
- ORCID
- Grabowski, Joachim
- Venue
- Studies in Writing
- Publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing
- Published
- 2010-02-06
- Pages
- 165-179
- ISSN
- 1572-6304 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2480814840
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.40
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- word recall, knowledge retention, writing to learn
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review