Unveiling FinTech adoption: an integrated approach of TAM and E-S-QUAL models for assessing the impact of service quality
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The rapid advancement of Financial Technology (FinTech) has ushered in a new era of financial services, with innovative solutions that have the potential to transform how individuals and businesses manage their finances. This research study explores the critical factors affecting the adoption of FinTech services by integrating the TAM and the E-S-QUAL model with a special focus on the service quality of FinTech services. Design/methodology/approach The study used partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) for testing both measurement and structural models. Data were collected from 304 FinTech users in India. Findings The findings supported the hypotheses that perceived ease of use (PE) and perceived usefulness (PU) significantly influence the use of FinTech services. Moreover, a strong positive relationship exists between PE and PU, highlighting the interdependence of these factors in FinTech adoption. Additionally, service quality emerges as a pivotal factor, positively impacting both PE and PU, further enhancing the use of FinTech services. Practical implications FinTech companies should prioritise strategic investments in user experience (UX), user interface (UI) design and systematic usability testing, which will lead to significant improvements in user engagement. Policymakers should focus on developing supportive regulatory frameworks that both foster FinTech innovation and safeguard data privacy. Originality/value The conceptual model, by integrating TAM and E-S-QUAL in the context of FinTech adoption in an emerging country, India, makes a pivotal contribution to the literature on both service quality and FinTech.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent research highlights the complementary roles of TPB and TAM in explaining the adoption of Fintech services.
“Recent research highlights the complementary roles of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in explaining the adoption of Fintech services[13], [14].”
From Enhancing Digital Financial Literacy and Digital Trust for Sustainable Online Loan Adoption among Micro-Entrepreneurs in Developing Economies (2026) · cites this paper as [14]
Evidence from Johri et al. (2024) and Amnas et al. (2025) reinforces context-dependent prioritization.
“Evidence from Johri et al. (2024) and Amnas et al. (2025) reinforces this context-dependent prioritization [7], [65].”
From Enhancing Digital Financial Literacy and Digital Trust for Sustainable Online Loan Adoption among Micro-Entrepreneurs in Developing Economies (2026) · cites this paper as Amnas et al. (2025)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Amnas, M. B., Selvam, M., & Parayitam, S.
- Affiliations
- Bharathidasan University (IN)
- University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
- Venue
- South Asian Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2025-09-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-69
- ISSN
- 2719-2377 (ISSN-L)
- 2738-2486
- OpenAlex
- W4414269777
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- South Asian Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- fintech adoption, technology acceptance model, e-service quality, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, service quality, fintech services, user experience design, fintech regulation, data privacy, India
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review