The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity and digital business transformation on industry 4.0 capabilities and sustainable supply chain performance
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the growing awareness of supply chains on industry 4.0 (I4.0) capabilities as the enabler of sustainable performance, little is known about what accelerates this interaction. Prior studies have focused on the ambidexterity dilemma and the need to adopt sustainable inter-organizational governance to drive I4.0 capabilities while achieving sustainable performance. To address these issues, this paper aims to explore the distinct and combined effects of several approaches such as digital business transformation (DBT), organizational ambidexterity (OA) and circular business models (CBMs) on the relationship between I4.0 capabilities and sustainable performance. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing upon a hybrid methodology including structural equation modeling and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis, this paper develops and tests a hypothetical model using data collected from 306 organizations in Europe, Asia and Africa. Findings: The study findings lead to several important implications concerning the potential paths linking I4.0 and sustainable performance. Notably, the DBT was found to mediate this relationship by integrating circular principles to devise business models. Moreover, OA was found to substitute the CBMs in developing new sustainable business models and reconcile sustainability. Originality/value: The study is among the first to analyze the combined effects of OA, DBT and CBMs on the relationship between I4.0 capabilities and sustainable performance at the supply chain level. Moreover, the findings propose several solutions to resolve the sustainability dilemma through I4.0 capabilities, DBT, OA and CBMs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda
Vial, G. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 · Cited by 7,337
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 · Cited by 1,440
Self-citationOptions for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy
Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2020) · Strategic Information Management · doi:10.4324/9780429286797-7 · Cited by 1,266
A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns
Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12763 · Cited by 1,256
A review of Internet of Things (IoT) embedded sustainable supply chain for industry 4.0 requirements
Manavalan, E., & Jayakrishna, K. (2019) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.030 · Cited by 1,054
de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017 · Cited by 1,043
Cited by
Tsolakis, N., Schumacher, R., Dora, M., & Kumar, M. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04785-2 · Cited by 325
Zheng, L. J., Zhang, J. Z., Yee Sum Lee, L., Jasimuddin, S. M., & Mustafa Kamal, M. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120978 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mani, V.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-07-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 696-711
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3177749655
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 30.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity and digital business transformation on industry 4.0 capabilities and sustainable supply chain performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-04-2021-0152
- The paper
- Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mani, V. (2022). Analyzing the mediating role of organizational ambidexterity and digital business transformation on industry 4.0 capabilities and sustainable supply chain performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-04-2021-0152
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.