Cited by 159Quality and Supply ManagementManagement and Optimization TechniquesSustainable Supply Chain Management

Contextual factors and lean production implementation in the Brazilian automotive supply chain

Marodin, Giuliano Almeida, Frank, Alejandro Germán, Tortorella, Guilherme Luz, Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu·2016·Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to understand the patterns of lean production implementation, and the relationship between three context factors (i.e. firm size, positions within the supply chain and time length of the lean initiative) and the adoption of lean production practices in firms of the automotive supply chain in Brazil. Design/methodology/approach: The authors collected data from 65 companies of the automotive supply chain in Brazil. For data analysis, first a cluster analysis was performed to identify common characteristics in the companies’ context factors when considering patterns of lean implementation. Then, multivariate analysis of variance was used to investigate the differences between the context factors and the degree of use of lean practices. Findings: High lean adopters had better performance than low lean adopters in terms of lead time, inventory and turnover. Firms at the first and second tier of the automotive supply chain were “leaner” than firms at the third tier. Large-sized firms were more likely to have a higher degree of use of lean practices than medium and smaller ones. Some, but not all, lean practices followed these patterns. Results also showed that some lean practices were most commonly adopted at the beginning of the lean journey, whereas others took more time to mature. Originality/value: This paper demonstrated how lean practices were implemented at different positions within the supply chain, and the patterns of implementation often followed. It also considers lean in the context of developing countries such as Brazil.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/scm-05-2015-0170

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marodin, G. A., Frank, A. G., Tortorella, G. L., & Saurin, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR)
Venue
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2016-06-13
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
417-432
ISSN
1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2442911546
Cited by
159
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 10
FWCI
36.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
lean manufacturing, lean manufacturing implementation, automotive supply chain, firm size, supply chain position, lead time, inventory, inventory turnover, developing countries, Brazilian automotive industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review