The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research
Abstract
Purpose: – This paper aims to conduct a systematic review of the literature on supply chain collaboration published over a 10-year period from 2005 to 2014. It explores the nature and extent of research undertaken to identify key themes emerging in the field and gaps that need to be addressed. Design/methodology/approach: – The authors review a sample of 207 articles from 69 journals, after using an iterative cycle of defining appropriate search keywords, searching the literature and conducting the analysis. Findings: – Key themes include the meaning of collaboration; considerations for supply chain collaboration theory; emerging areas in collaboration for sustainability, technology-enabled supply chains and humanitarian supply chains; and the need for a more holistic approach, multi-tier perspectives and research into B2C collaborations. Research limitations/implications: – The paper provides discussion and scope for future research into the area which would contribute to the field tremendously. Originality/value: – There have been very few reviews in the past on supply chain collaboration, and this is one of the first extensive reviews conducted to address how well the body of knowledge on supply chain collaboration corresponds with our contemporary society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Research Methods for Business Students
Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. R. (2003) · Cited by 17,205
Spence, M. (1973) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882010 · Cited by 16,171
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Cited by
Does finance solve the supply chain financing problem?
Caniato, F., Gelsomino, L. M., Perego, A., & Ronchi, S. (2016) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-11-2015-0436 · Cited by 265
At the Nexus of Blockchain Technology, the Circular Economy, and Product Deletion
Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Zhu, Q. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9081712 · Cited by 219
Papaioannou, G., Mohammed, A.-M., Despoudi, S., Saridakis, G., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102077 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Soosay, C. A., & Hyland, P.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2015-09-14
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 613-630
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1906222491
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 50.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-06-2015-0217
- The paper
- Soosay, C. A., & Hyland, P. (2015). A decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-06-2015-0217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.