The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply Chain 4.0: concepts, maturity and research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Industry 4.0 is one of the most emergent research topics attracting significant interest by researchers as well as practitioners. Many articles have been published with regards Industry 4.0; however, there is no research that clearly conceptualizes Industry 4.0 in the context of supply chain. This paper aims to propose the term “Supply Chain 4.0” together with a novel conceptual framework that captures the essence of Industry 4.0 within the supply chain context. As Industry 4.0 is inherently a revolution, and as revolutions are evolutionary, this research also aims to capture the evolution of Supply Chain 4.0 from maturity levels perspective to facilitate the formulation and development of Supply Chain 4.0 strategy. Design/methodology/approach: Following a deductive research approach and a qualitative strategy, a systematic literature review (SLR) was adopted as the research method seeking to understand the relationships among supply chain, Industry 4.0 and maturity levels research. The three phases of the SLR process utilized are: planning, conducting and reporting. A concept-oriented technique was applied to the outputs of the SLR to obtain the key constructs that would facilitate the development of the conceptual Supply Chain 4.0 framework. Findings: The SLR showed that there is limited research linking Industry 4.0 to supply chain. Nevertheless, it was possible to extract a set of thematic categories from the analysis of the articles which are referred to as constructs as they form the core of the conceptual Supply Chain 4.0 framework. These constructs are managerial and capability supporters, technology levers, processes performance requirements and strategic outcomes. Each of these constructs consists of a number of elements which are referred to as “dimensions” in this research and a total of 21 dimensions were identified during the SLR. The SLR also demonstrated that maturity propositions for Industry 4.0 are still embrionary and entirely missing in the context of supply chain. Hence, this research develops and proposes a maturity levels framework that is underpinned by the core constructs of Supply Chain 4.0 and the corresponding dimensions. As these proposed frameworks are conceptual, this research also identifies and proposes several research directions to help fortify the Supply Chain 4.0 concept. Research limitations/implications: This research argues that the frameworks are robust because the constructs and dimensions are grounded in the literature, thus demonstrating both theoretical and practical relevance and value. As Supply Chain 4.0 research is still in infancy, there is a range of open research questions suggested based on the frameworks that could serve as guides for researchers to further develop the Supply Chain 4.0 concept. Also, practitioners can use this framework to develop better understanding of Supply Chain 4.0 and be able to evaluate the maturity of their organizations. As the proposed frameworks are conceptual, they require further empirical research to validate them and obtain new insights. Originality/value: The SLR demonstrated a clear gap in literature with regards to Industry 4.0 in the context of supply chain, and also in the context of Industry 4.0 maturity levels for supply chain. This research is unique as it formulates and introduces novel frameworks that close these gaps in literature. The value of this research lies in the fact that it makes significant contribution in terms of understanding of Supply Chain 4.0 with a clear set of constructs and dimensions that form Supply Chain 4.0, which provides the foundation for further work in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues
Lu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005 · Cited by 3,012
How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition
Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014) · Harvard business review · Cited by 2,600
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Past, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 · Cited by 2,036
How ‘big data’ can make big impact: findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study
Fosso Wamba, S., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.031 · Cited by 1,905
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 · Cited by 1,893
Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics
Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002 · Cited by 1,841
A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises
Schumacher, A., Erol, S., & Sihn, W. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040 · Cited by 1,766
Wang, G., Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E. W. T., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.03.014 · Cited by 1,545
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 2016, Supply Chain 4.0 In Consumer Good
- 2016, Towards industry 4.0: mapping digital technologies for supply chain management marketing-integration, Business Process Management Journal, 25, 173
- 2018, The position of industry 4.0 in the worldwide logistics chains, LOGI - Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 9, 18, 10.2478/logi-2018-0003 · doi:10.2478/logi-2018-0003
- 2005, The British Industrial Revolution, 1760-1780
- 1994, Information technology and the third industrial revolution, The Electronic Library, 12, 229
- Gottge, S. and Menzel, T. (2017), “An exploratory multiple case study on the purchasing process reshaped by industry 4.0 in the automotive industry”, Master Thesis, Linnaeus University, available at: www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1109682/FULLTEXT02.pdf
- 1984, The new technologies: an industrial revolution, Journal of Business Strategy, 5, 83, 10.1108/eb039061 · doi:10.1108/eb039061
- 2017, Development of an industrie 4.0 maturity index for small and Medium-Sized enterprises
- 2017, Global Supply Chain and Operations Management: A Decision Oriented Introduction to the Creation of Value
- 2008, Logistics and Supply Chain Management
- 2013, Recommendations For Implementing The Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0
- 2009, Developing a maturity model for supply chain management, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5, 654, 10.1504/IJLSM.2009.024796 · doi:10.1504/ijlsm.2009.024796
- 1998, The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870-1914
- 2017, Towards lean production in industry 4.0, Procedia Manufacturing, 182, 466
- 2018, Supply chain 4.0: digital transformation, disruptions and strategies, Review of Business and Technology Research, 14, 32
- 2011, Proposing a quick best practice maturity test for supply chain operations, Measuring Business Excellence, 15, 66, 10.1108/13683041111113259 · doi:10.1108/13683041111113259
- 2015, The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain
- 2018, Industry 4.0: smart scheduling, International Journal of Production Research, 1
- 2018, A maturity model for business model management in industry 4.0
- 2010, Supply chain management maturity and performance in SMEs, Operations Management Research, 3, 90
- 2017, The impact of digitization on product offerings: using direct digital manufacturing in the supply chain
- 2002, Analysing the past to prepare for the future, MIS Quarterly, 26, 8
- 2014, Special issue: building theory in supply chain management through “systematic reviews” of the literature, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19
Cited by
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Mani, V. (2022) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-04-2021-0152 · Cited by 259
Digitalizing procurement: The impact of data analytics on supply chain performance
Hallikas, J., Immonen, M., & Brax, S. (2021) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2020-0201 · Cited by 218
Beaulieu, M., & Bentahar, O. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120717 · Cited by 195
Supply Chain 4.0: A Survey of Cyber Security Challenges, Solutions and Future Directions
Sobb, T., Turnbull, B., & Moustafa, N. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9111864 · Cited by 189
The role of big data for Supply Chain 4.0 in manufacturing organisations of developing countries
Narwane, V. S., Raut, R. D., Yadav, V. S., Cheikhrouhou, N., Narkhede, B. E., & Priyadarshinee, P. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-11-2020-0463 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., & Kumar, V.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-09-14
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 262-282
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2947436355
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 28.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply Chain 4.0: concepts, maturity and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-09-2018-0339
- The paper
- Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., & Kumar, V. (2019). Supply Chain 4.0: concepts, maturity and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-09-2018-0339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.