Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supply Chain 4.0: concepts, maturity and research agenda

Open access
Frederico, Guilherme F., Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, Anosike, Anthony, Kumar, Vikas·2019·Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: Industry 4.0 is one of the most emergent research topics attracting significant interest by researchers as well as practitioners. Many articles have been published with regards Industry 4.0; however, there is no research that clearly conceptualizes Industry 4.0 in the context of supply chain. This paper aims to propose the term “Supply Chain 4.0” together with a novel conceptual framework that captures the essence of Industry 4.0 within the supply chain context. As Industry 4.0 is inherently a revolution, and as revolutions are evolutionary, this research also aims to capture the evolution of Supply Chain 4.0 from maturity levels perspective to facilitate the formulation and development of Supply Chain 4.0 strategy. Design/methodology/approach: Following a deductive research approach and a qualitative strategy, a systematic literature review (SLR) was adopted as the research method seeking to understand the relationships among supply chain, Industry 4.0 and maturity levels research. The three phases of the SLR process utilized are: planning, conducting and reporting. A concept-oriented technique was applied to the outputs of the SLR to obtain the key constructs that would facilitate the development of the conceptual Supply Chain 4.0 framework. Findings: The SLR showed that there is limited research linking Industry 4.0 to supply chain. Nevertheless, it was possible to extract a set of thematic categories from the analysis of the articles which are referred to as constructs as they form the core of the conceptual Supply Chain 4.0 framework. These constructs are managerial and capability supporters, technology levers, processes performance requirements and strategic outcomes. Each of these constructs consists of a number of elements which are referred to as “dimensions” in this research and a total of 21 dimensions were identified during the SLR. The SLR also demonstrated that maturity propositions for Industry 4.0 are still embrionary and entirely missing in the context of supply chain. Hence, this research develops and proposes a maturity levels framework that is underpinned by the core constructs of Supply Chain 4.0 and the corresponding dimensions. As these proposed frameworks are conceptual, this research also identifies and proposes several research directions to help fortify the Supply Chain 4.0 concept. Research limitations/implications: This research argues that the frameworks are robust because the constructs and dimensions are grounded in the literature, thus demonstrating both theoretical and practical relevance and value. As Supply Chain 4.0 research is still in infancy, there is a range of open research questions suggested based on the frameworks that could serve as guides for researchers to further develop the Supply Chain 4.0 concept. Also, practitioners can use this framework to develop better understanding of Supply Chain 4.0 and be able to evaluate the maturity of their organizations. As the proposed frameworks are conceptual, they require further empirical research to validate them and obtain new insights. Originality/value: The SLR demonstrated a clear gap in literature with regards to Industry 4.0 in the context of supply chain, and also in the context of Industry 4.0 maturity levels for supply chain. This research is unique as it formulates and introduces novel frameworks that close these gaps in literature. The value of this research lies in the fact that it makes significant contribution in terms of understanding of Supply Chain 4.0 with a clear set of constructs and dimensions that form Supply Chain 4.0, which provides the foundation for further work in this area.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/scm-09-2018-0339

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 2016, Supply Chain 4.0 In Consumer Good
  2. 2016, Towards industry 4.0: mapping digital technologies for supply chain management marketing-integration, Business Process Management Journal, 25, 173
  3. 2018, The position of industry 4.0 in the worldwide logistics chains, LOGI - Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, 9, 18, 10.2478/logi-2018-0003 · doi:10.2478/logi-2018-0003
  4. 2005, The British Industrial Revolution, 1760-1780
  5. 1994, Information technology and the third industrial revolution, The Electronic Library, 12, 229
  6. Gottge, S. and Menzel, T. (2017), “An exploratory multiple case study on the purchasing process reshaped by industry 4.0 in the automotive industry”, Master Thesis, Linnaeus University, available at: www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1109682/FULLTEXT02.pdf
  7. 1984, The new technologies: an industrial revolution, Journal of Business Strategy, 5, 83, 10.1108/eb039061 · doi:10.1108/eb039061
  8. 2017, Development of an industrie 4.0 maturity index for small and Medium-Sized enterprises
  9. 2017, Global Supply Chain and Operations Management: A Decision Oriented Introduction to the Creation of Value
  10. 2008, Logistics and Supply Chain Management
  11. 2013, Recommendations For Implementing The Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0
  12. 2009, Developing a maturity model for supply chain management, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5, 654, 10.1504/IJLSM.2009.024796 · doi:10.1504/ijlsm.2009.024796
  13. 1998, The Second Industrial Revolution, 1870-1914
  14. 2017, Towards lean production in industry 4.0, Procedia Manufacturing, 182, 466
  15. 2018, Supply chain 4.0: digital transformation, disruptions and strategies, Review of Business and Technology Research, 14, 32
  16. 2011, Proposing a quick best practice maturity test for supply chain operations, Measuring Business Excellence, 15, 66, 10.1108/13683041111113259 · doi:10.1108/13683041111113259
  17. 2015, The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain
  18. 2018, Industry 4.0: smart scheduling, International Journal of Production Research, 1
  19. 2018, A maturity model for business model management in industry 4.0
  20. 2010, Supply chain management maturity and performance in SMEs, Operations Management Research, 3, 90
  21. 2017, The impact of digitization on product offerings: using direct digital manufacturing in the supply chain
  22. 2002, Analysing the past to prepare for the future, MIS Quarterly, 26, 8
  23. 2014, Special issue: building theory in supply chain management through “systematic reviews” of the literature, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., & Kumar, V.
Venue
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-09-14
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
262-282
ISSN
1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947436355
Cited by
371
References
61
FWCI
28.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply Chain 4.0: concepts, maturity and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-09-2018-0339
The paper
Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., & Kumar, V. (2019). Supply Chain 4.0: concepts, maturity and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-09-2018-0339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.