The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the proliferation of supply chain risk management (SCRM) studies, a theoretically supported and empirically validated study on justifying the antecedents and measurement dimensions of supply chain resilience (SCRE) is rare. Therefore, drawing on extensive literature review, this study aims to explore and validate the antecedents and the measurement dimensions of SCRE. Design/methodology/approach: This study uses positivist paradigm using quantitative method. However, it also uses qualitative approach in the form of field study to contextualize the research model. The quantitative study is conducted by operationalising a survey research. Partial least square-based structural equation modelling has been used to analyze the data. Findings: Study results suggest that the psychometric properties of the SCRE dimensions, supply chain readiness, response and recovery, are reliable and valid. It also affirms that supply chain orientation (SCO), learning and development and supply chain risk management culture (SCRMC) significantly influence the SCRE. Further, SCRMC mediates the relationship between SCO and SCRE. Practical implications: The findings of this study will assist the supply chain managers in taking decision on readiness capability development and reducing the decisional uncertainty during response and recovery. Originality/value: Drawing on extensive extant literature on crisis management and supply chain management, this study develops and validates the measurement dimensions of SCRE in terms of readiness, response and recovery, as well as justifies the antecedent factors of SCRE, which is a novel attempt in SCRM literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Holling, C. S. (1973) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · Cited by 18,995
The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009) · Advances in International Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2009)0000020014 · Cited by 10,926
Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions
Stone, M. (1974) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x · Cited by 10,881
Qualitative research: Methods in the social sciences: (668352010-001)
(2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e668352010-001 · Cited by 10,605
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376806 · Cited by 5,807
Cited by
COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review
Chowdhury, P., Paul, S. K., Kaisar, S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2021) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271 · Cited by 992
Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Fosso Wamba, S., Roubaud, D., & Foropon, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1582820 · Cited by 958
Spieske, A., & Birkel, H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107452 · Cited by 499
Zamani, E. D., Smyth, C., Gupta, S., & Dennehy, D. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04983-y · Cited by 409
Supply chain resilience: a systematic literature review and typological framework
Kochan, C. G., & Nowicki, D. R. (2018) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0099 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2016-09-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 709-731
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2564791590
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 114
- FWCI
- 19.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/scm-12-2015-0463
- The paper
- Chowdhury, M. M. H., & Quaddus, M. (2016). Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-12-2015-0463
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.