Cited by 17Environmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Supply Chain ManagementCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pseudo green players and their greenwashing practices: a differentiating strategy for real green firms of personal care category

Jog, Deepti, Singhal, Divya·2019·Strategic Direction

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a view point on greenwashing practices used by pseudo green players to gain competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach: The paper presents a description of various tactics of greenwashing and suggest some strategies for real green companies to differentiate themselves. Findings: Although there is a huge market available for green products, greenwashing brings a tough challenge for real green companies. This paper highlights various tactics used by pseudo green players to get competitive advantage with minimum green effort. Practical implications: Real green companies are not able to differentiate themselves and thus lose market share. Originality/value: The paper offers some strategies to tackle the challenges posed by greenwashing behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/sd-07-2019-0143

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 2015, Successful green branding, a new shift in brand strategy: why and how it works, Romanian Economic Journal, 18
  2. 2018, A multi-dimensional approach of green marketing competitive advantage: a perspective of small medium and micro enterprises from Western Cape, South Africa, Sustainability, 10, 3764, 10.3390/su10103764 · DOI
  3. 2003, Social accountability and corporate greenwashing, Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253, 10.1023/A:1022962719299 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Jog, D., & Singhal, D.
Venue
Strategic Direction
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2019-12-09
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
4-7
ISSN
0258-0543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979601259
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Strategic Direction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
greenwashing, green marketing, competitive advantage, differentiation strategy, personal care products, green products, green companies, market share

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review