What do employees want? Halting record-setting turnovers globally
Abstract
Purpose: Retaining talents has been a significant issue for companies globally. Recent statistics suggest that the trend is rising at an alarming rate. This paper aims at examining these statistics, the driving factors, and how organisations can deal with this issue to retain current employees and to attract prospective employees. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses the drivers of these high turnover rates and the associated costs. Based on these, suggestions on how to retain and attract talents are offered. Findings: The evidence available illustrates that employee turnover continues to hamper the growth of companies and can pose existential threats to these companies. It also suggests that listening to concerns or reasons accounting for the exit of employees can go a long way to reduce the current trends. Practical implications: The suggestions presented in this paper highlight the possibility of curbing the high rate of turnover. By taking these suggestions, organisations can avoid the enormous costs associated with employee turnover while building a healthy organisation for their employees. Originality/value: This work is timely given the high rate of turnover recorded worldwide, even during the pandemic.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employees who feel they are not offered opportunities for career growth are more likely to switch companies.
“as employees who feel they are not offered opportunities for career growth are more likely to switch companies (Tenakwah, 2021).”
From The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations (2023) · cites this paper as Tenakwah, 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Workers' Skills: Upskilling and Reskilling in Organisations
Morandini, S., Fraboni, F., De Angelis, M., Puzzo, G., Giusino, D., & Pietrantoni, L. (2023) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/5078 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
“Reskilling can also help organi s ations retain their top talent, as employees who feel they are not offered opportunities for career growth are more likely to switch companies (Tenakwah, 2021).”
BackgroundNavigating the Complexity of Generative AI Adoption in Software Engineering
Russo, D. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3652154 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
“To mitigate this challenge, organizations should communicate the benefits of LLMs and focus on upskilling and reskilling employees [12, 101].”
Background
- Authors
- Tenakwah, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Charles Darwin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Tenakwah, Emmanuel Senior
- Venue
- Strategic HR Review
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2021-10-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 206-210
- ISSN
- 1475-4398 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3201190796
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic HR Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Keywords
- employee turnover, talent retention, employee attrition, turnover costs, talent attraction, employee voice, COVID-19 pandemic, organisational health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review