The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methods to assess physical activity with special reference to motion sensors and accelerometers
Abstract
Motion sensors may be applied for the assessment of physical activity. This paper reviews the evolution of these instruments from the mechanical pedometer to the electronic accelerometer. We conclude that for accurate assessment of physical activity under free living conditions the recently introduced accelerometer looks most promising, although little information was available regarding the reliability of these instruments. Subsequently, reliability of an accelerometer with a three-directional sensor was examined. Intrainstrument variation in a bench test was less than 8% during four measurements over a week. Interinstrument variation during treadmill experiments while subjects wore two accelerometers at the same time was on average 22% and was not improved after adjustment for differences found in the bench test. Reproducibility in the treadmill experiment was approximately 76, 85, and 95% at 3, 5, and 7 km/h, respectively. Bench testing revealed that the sensitivity of a piezoelectric element is prone to shifts, probably due to mechanical, electromagnetic, and/or temperature shock, which may be encountered during outdoor application. However, the relevance of the bench test in this study may be questioned, as results did not correspond with the findings in subjects. This needs further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring
Yang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100807772 · Cited by 1,058
Bouten, C. V. C., Koekkoek, K. T. M., Verduin, M., Kodde, R., & Janssen, J. D. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.554760 · Cited by 911
Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry
Godfrey, A., Conway, R., Meagher, D., & ÓLaighin, G. (2008) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.005 · Cited by 591
Accuracy of five electronic pedometers for measuring distance walked
BASSETT, D. R., AINSWORTH, B. E., LEGGETT, S. R., MATHIEN, C. A., MAIN, J. A., HUNTER, D. C., & DUNCAN, G. E. (1996) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199608000-00019 · Cited by 552
Dowd, K. P., Szeklicki, R., Minetto, M. A., Murphy, M. H., Polito, A., Ghigo, E., van der Ploeg, H., Ekelund, U., Maciaszek, J., Stemplewski, R., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2 · Cited by 385
Metadata
- Authors
- Meijer, G. A. L., Westerterp, K. R., Verhoeven, F. M. H., Koper, H. B. M., & ten Hoor, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1991-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 221-229
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122208134
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods to assess physical activity with special reference to motion sensors and accelerometers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.133202
- The paper
- Meijer, G. A. L., Westerterp, K. R., Verhoeven, F. M. H., Koper, H. B. M., & ten Hoor, F. (1991). Methods to assess physical activity with special reference to motion sensors and accelerometers. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.133202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.