Cited by 591Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Direct measurement of human movement by accelerometry

Open access
Godfrey, A., Conway, R., Meagher, D., ÓLaighin, G.·2008·Medical Engineering & Physics

Abstract

Human movement has been the subject of investigation since the fifth century when early scientists and researchers attempted to model the human musculoskeletal system. The anatomical complexities of the human body have made it a constant source of research to this day with many anatomical, physiological, mechanical, environmental, sociological and psychological studies undertaken to define its key elements. These studies have utilised modern day techniques to assess human movement in many illnesses. One such modern technique has been direct measurement by accelerometry, which was first suggested in the 1970s but has only been refined and perfected during the last 10-15 years. Direct measurement by accelerometry has seen the introduction of the successful implementation of low power, low cost electronic sensors that have been employed in clinical and home environments for the constant monitoring of patients (and their controls). The qualitative and quantitative data provided by these sensors make it possible for engineers, clinicians and physicians to work together to be able to help their patients in overcoming their physical disability. This paper presents the underlying biomechanical elements necessary to understand and study human movement. It also reflects on the sociological elements of human movement and why it is important in patient life and well being. Finally the concept of direct measurement by accelerometry is presented with past studies and modern techniques used for data analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.09.005

Cites

143 of 143 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godfrey, A., Conway, R., Meagher, D., & ÓLaighin, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • University Hospital Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
Godfrey, A.
Venue
Medical Engineering & Physics
Published
2008-11-08
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
1364-1386
ISSN
  • 1350-4533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-4030
OpenAlex
W2164184994
Cited by
591
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 38
FWCI
37.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Engineering & Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
accelerometry, human movement, gait analysis, wearable sensors, patient monitoring, biomechanics, musculoskeletal system, physical disability, clinical gait analysis
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Movement, Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review