The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation
Abstract
A brain microstate is defined as a functional/physiological state of the brain during which specific neural computations are performed. It is characterized uniquely by a fixed spatial distribution of active neuronal generators with time varying intensity. Brain electrical activity is modeled as being composed of a time sequence of nonoverlapping microstates with variable duration. A precise mathematical formulation of the model for evoked potential recordings is presented, where the microstates are represented as normalized vectors constituted by scalp electric potentials due to the underlying generators. An algorithm is developed for estimating the microstates, based on a modified version of the classical k-means clustering method, in which cluster orientations are estimated. Consequently, each instantaneous multichannel evoked potential measurement is classified as belonging to some microstate, thus producing a natural segmentation of brain activity. Use is made of statistical image segmentation techniques for obtaining smooth continuous segments. Time varying intensities are estimated by projecting the measurements onto their corresponding microstates. A goodness of fit statistic for the model is presented. Finally, a method is introduced for estimating the number of microstates, based on nonparametric data-driven statistical resampling techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter
Golub, G. H., Heath, M., & Wahba, G. (1979) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489751 · Cited by 3,934
Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain
Hillyard, S. A., Hink, R. F., Schwent, V. L., & Picton, T. W. (1973) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.182.4108.177 · Cited by 1,934
Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields
Lehmann, D., & Skrandies, W. (1980) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(80)90419-8 · Cited by 1,552
Self-citationHuman auditory evoked potentials. I: Evaluation of components
Picton, T. W., Hillyard, S. A., Krausz, H. I., & Galambos, R. (1974) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(74)90155-2 · Cited by 1,468
(1952) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,436
EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation
Lehmann, D., Ozaki, H., & Pal, I. (1987) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(87)90025-3 · Cited by 913
Self-citationSubspace methods of pattern recognition
(1984) · Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/0165-1684(84)90028-8 · Cited by 791
Processing negativity: An evoked-potential reflection.
Näätänen, R. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.605 · Cited by 684
Principles of spatial analysis
Lehmann, D. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 507
Self-citation
Cited by
Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state
Allen, E. A., Damaraju, E., Plis, S. M., Erhardt, E. B., Eichele, T., & Calhoun, V. D. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs352 · Cited by 2,992
The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery
Calhoun, V. D., Miller, R., Pearlson, G., & Adalı, T. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015 · Cited by 1,378
Topographic ERP Analyses: A Step-by-Step Tutorial Review
Murray, M. M., Brunet, D., & Michel, C. M. (2008) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5 · Cited by 1,127
Self-citationBOLD correlates of EEG topography reveal rapid resting-state network dynamics
Britz, J., Van De Ville, D., & Michel, C. M. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.052 · Cited by 1,070
Self-citationSpatiotemporal Analysis of Multichannel EEG: CARTOOL
Brunet, D., Murray, M. M., & Michel, C. M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/813870 · Cited by 731
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 658-665
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2130031954
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.391164
- The paper
- Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D. (1995). Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.391164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.