Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. II. Comparison with measurements in phantoms

Flock, S.T., Wilson, B.C., Patterson, M.S.·1989·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Measurements of the fluence-depth distributions and of the diffuse reflectance of 633 nm light have been made in liquid media with optical properties similar to soft tissues. The results are compared with predictions of Monte Carlo computer calculations in order to test the adequacy of Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in tissue. Except at extremely high albedo, the experimental data and the Monte Carlo results agree well for the depth dependence of the fluence as a function of incident light beam diameter and optical absorption and scattering, and for the dependence of the diffuse reflectance on the albedo. The absolute experimental values for the fluence must be renormalized by a factor which varies with the albedo in order to match the model values, and the possible sources of this discrepancy are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/10.42107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Flock, S. T., Wilson, B. C., & Patterson, M. S.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1989
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1169-1173
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086379021
Cited by
177
References
0
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. II. Comparison with measurements in phantoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.42107
The paper
Flock, S. T., Wilson, B. C., & Patterson, M. S. (1989). Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. II. Comparison with measurements in phantoms. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.42107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.