Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. I. Model predictions and comparison with diffusion theory

Flock, S.T., Patterson, M.S., Wilson, B.C., Wyman, D.R.·1989·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Using optical interaction coefficients typical of mammalian soft tissues in the red and near infrared regions of the spectrum, calculations of fluence-depth distributions, effective penetration depths and diffuse reflectance from two models of radiative transfer, diffusion theory, and Monte Carlo simulation are compared for a semi-infinite medium. The predictions from diffusion theory are shown to be increasingly inaccurate as the albedo tends to zero and/or the average cosine of scatter tends to unity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.1989.1173624

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Flock, S. T., Patterson, M. S., Wilson, B. C., & Wyman, D. R.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
1989-12
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1162-1168
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2021750959
Cited by
489
References
13
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. I. Model predictions and comparison with diffusion theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.1989.1173624
The paper
Flock, S. T., Patterson, M. S., Wilson, B. C., & Wyman, D. R. (1989). Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. I. Model predictions and comparison with diffusion theory. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.1989.1173624

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.