The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults
Abstract
Measures of postural steadiness are used to characterize the dynamics of the postural control system associated with maintaining balance during quiet standing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative sensitivity of center-of-pressure (COP)-based measures to changes in postural steadiness related to age. A variety of time and frequency domain measures of postural steadiness were compared between a group of twenty healthy young adults (21-35 years) and a group of twenty healthy elderly adults (66-70 years) under both eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. The measures that identified differences between the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions in the young adult group were different than those that identified differences between the eye conditions in the elderly adult group. Mean velocity of the COP was the only measure that identified age-related changes in both eye conditions, and differences between eye conditions in both groups. The results of this study will be useful to researchers and clinicians using COP-based measures to evaluate postural steadiness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Comparison Procedures
Hochberg, Y., & Tamhane, A. C. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316672 · Cited by 2,389
Cited by
ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control
Mancini, M., Salarian, A., Carlson-Kuhta, P., Zampieri, C., King, L., Chiari, L., & Horak, F. B. (2012) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-9-59 · Cited by 499
The clinical utility of posturography
Visser, J. E., Carpenter, M. G., van der Kooij, H., & Bloem, B. R. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.220 · Cited by 490
A freezing‐like posture to pictures of mutilation
Azevedo, T. M., Volchan, E., Imbiriba, L. A., Rodrigues, E. C., Oliveira, J. M., Oliveira, L. F., Lutterbach, L. G., & Vargas, C. D. (2005) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00287.x · Cited by 320
Feature selection of stabilometric parameters based on principal component analysis.
Rocchi, L., Chiari, L., & Cappello, A. (2004) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02351013 · Cited by 237
Surface height effects on postural control: A hypothesis for a stiffness strategy for stance
Carpenter, M. G., Frank, J. S., & Silcher, C. P. (1999) · Journal of Vestibular Research · doi:10.3233/ves-1999-9405 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Prieto, T. E., Myklebust, J. B., Hoffmann, R. G., Lovett, E. G., & Myklebust, B. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 956-966
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138554597
- Cited by
- 1,863
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.532130
- The paper
- Prieto, T. E., Myklebust, J. B., Hoffmann, R. G., Lovett, E. G., & Myklebust, B. M. (1996). Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.532130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
