Cited by 228Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionMotor Control and AdaptationRobotic Locomotion and Control

Surface height effects on postural control: A hypothesis for a stiffness strategy for stance

Carpenter, Mark G., Frank, James S., Silcher, Cathy P.·1999·Journal of Vestibular Research

Abstract

One possible factor influencing the control of upright stance is the perceived threat to one's personal safety, i.e. balance confidence. We explored this factor by examining the control of stationary stance when standing on an elevated platform under various conditions of reduced visual and vestibular inputs. Twenty-eight adults (14 male and 14 female, mean age = 23.5 years) participated in the experiment. Postural control was examined by recording the amplitude variability (RMS) and mean power frequency (MPF) of center of pressure excursions (COP) over a 2-minute interval while participants stood in a normal stance on a low (0.19 m) and a high (0.81 m) platform with toes positioned either at or away from the edge of the platform. Vision was manipulated through eyes open and eyes closed trials. Vestibular input was reduced by tilting the head into extension [1]. Anterior-posterior RMS and MPF of COP were significantly influenced by an interaction between surface height and vision. When vision was available, a significant decrease in RMS was observed during quiet standing on a high surface compared to a low surface independent of step restriction. When vision was available MPF increased when subjects were raised from a low to a high surface. The mean position of the COP was significantly influenced by an interaction between height and step restriction. Differences in RMS and MPF responses to height manipulation were observed between genders in eyes closed conditions. Vestibular input influenced postural control at both low and high levels with significant increases in RMS when vestibular input was reduced. The reciprocal changes observed in RMS and MPF suggest modifications to postural control through changes in ankle stiffness. Vision appears to play a role in increasing ankle stiffness when balance confidence is compromised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/ves-1999-9405

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carpenter, M. G., Frank, J. S., & Silcher, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Journal of Vestibular Research
Published
1999-08-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
277-286
ISSN
  • 0957-4271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6464
OpenAlex
W111448621
Cited by
228
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Vestibular Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
Keywords
postural control, upright posture, surface elevation, ankle stiffness, balance confidence, center of pressure, visual input, vestibular input, eyes closed, head tilt, gender differences, quiet standing
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Ankle, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Kinesthesis, Male, Muscle Tonus, Posture, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Vision, Ocular, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review