The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem
Abstract
In this paper, we present a new approach to the recovering of dipole magnitudes in a distributed source model for magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) imaging. This method consists in introducing spatial and temporal a priori information as a cure to this ill-posed inverse problem. A nonlinear spatial regularization scheme allows the preservation of dipole moment discontinuities between some a priori noncorrelated sources, for instance, when considering dipoles located on both sides of a sulcus. Moreover, we introduce temporal smoothness constraints on dipole magnitude evolution, at time scales smaller than those of cognitive processes. These priors are easily integrated into a Bayesian formalism, yielding a maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimator of brain electrical activity. Results from EEG simulations of our method are presented and compared with those of classical quadratic regularization and a now popular generalized minimum-norm technique called low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis
Grech, R., Cassar, T., Muscat, J., Camilleri, K. P., Fabri, S. G., Zervakis, M., Xanthopoulos, P., Sakkalis, V., & Vanrumste, B. (2008) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-5-25 · Cited by 1,193
Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem.
Friston, K., Harrison, L., Daunizeau, J., Kiebel, S., Phillips, C., Trujillo-Barreto, N., Henson, R., Flandin, G., & Mattout, J. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.048 · Cited by 589
A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography
Hillebrand, A., Singh, K. D., Holliday, I. E., Furlong, P. L., & Barnes, G. R. (2005) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20102 · Cited by 549
Conventional and Quantitative Electroencephalography in Psychiatry
Hughes, J. R., & John, E. R. (1999) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.11.2.190 · Cited by 489
Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation
Darvas, F., Pantazis, D., Kucukaltun-Yildirim, E., & Leahy, R. M. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.014 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Baillet, S., & Garnero, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 374-385
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155143074
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/10.568913
- The paper
- Baillet, S., & Garnero, L. (1997). A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.568913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.