Cited by 121Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Selectivity of multiple-contact nerve cuff electrodes: a simulation analysis

Choi, A.Q., Cavanaugh, J.K., Durand, D.M.·2001·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Advances in functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) have increased the need for nerve cuff designs that can control multiple motor functions through selective stimulation of selected populations of axons. This selectivity has proved to be difficult to achieve. Recent experiments suggest that it is possible to slowly reshape peripheral nerve without affecting its physiological function. Using computer simulations we have tested the hypothesis that changing the cross section of a nerve from a round to a flat configuration can significantly improve the selectivity of a nerve cuff. We introduce a new index to estimate selectivity to evaluate the various designs. This index is based on the ability of a nerve electrode to stimulate a target axon without stimulating any other axons. The calculations involve a three-dimensional finite element model to represent the electrical properties of the nerve and cuff and the determination of the firing properties of individual axons. The selectivity rating was found to be significantly higher for the Flat Cuff than the Round Cuff. The result was valid with uniform or random distribution of axons and with a random distribution of fascicles diameters. Flattening of individual fascicles also improved the selectivity of the Flat Cuff but only when the number of contacts used was increased to maintain uniform contact density. Therefore, cuff designs that can reshape the nerve into flatter configurations should yield better cuff performance than…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/10.909637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 121

Authors
Choi, A. Q., Cavanaugh, J. K., & Durand, D. M.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2001
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
165-172
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118215470
Cited by
121
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS32484)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
cuff electrodes, functional electrical stimulation, finite element analysis, contact density, peripheral nerves
MeSH terms
Axons, Electrodes, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Membrane Potentials, Models, Neurological, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review