Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Checking before output may not be enough against fault-based cryptanalysis

Sung-Ming Yen, Joye, M.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Computers
DOI 10.1109/12.869328
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In order to avoid fault-based attacks on cryptographic security modules (e.g., smart-cards), some authors suggest that the computation results should be checked for faults before being transmitted. In this paper, we describe a potential fault-based attack where key bits leak only through the information whether the device produces a correct answer after a temporary fault or not. This information is available to the adversary even if a check is performed before output.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/12.869328

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Metadata

Authors
Yen, S.-M., & Joye, M.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computers
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2000
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
967-970
ISSN
0018-9340 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1109/12.869328
OpenAlex
W2144952508
Cited by
353
References
14
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Checking before output may not be enough against fault-based cryptanalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/12.869328
The paper
Yen, S.-M., & Joye, M. (2000). Checking before output may not be enough against fault-based cryptanalysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/12.869328

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.