Cited by 13,012Cryptography and Data SecurityCryptography and Residue ArithmeticComputer Science and Engineering

A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems

Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., Adleman, L.·1983·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

An encryption method is presented with the novel property that publicly revealing an encryption key does not thereby reveal the corresponding decryption key. This has two important consequences: Couriers or other secure means are not needed to transmit keys, since a message can be enciphered using an encryption key publicly revealed by the intended recipient. Only he can decipher the message, since only he knows the corresponding decryption key. A message can be “signed” using a privately held decryption key. Anyone can verify this signature using the corresponding publicly revealed encryption key. Signatures cannot be forged, and a signer cannot later deny the validity of his signature. This has obvious applications in “electronic mail” and “electronic funds transfer” systems. A message is encrypted by representing it as a number M, raising M to a publicly specified power e, and then taking the remainder when the result is divided by the publicly specified product, n , of two large secret prime numbers p and q. Decryption is similar; only a different, secret, power d is used, where e * d = 1(mod (p - 1) * (q - 1)). The security of the system rests in part on the difficulty of factoring the published divisor, n .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/357980.358017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RSA function E(x,y)=x^y mod η underlies the assumption that given E(x,y), y, and η, x cannot be computed in polynomial time.

    “Consider that the RSA function E( x , y ) = x y mod η underlies the assumption that given E( x , y ) , y , and η , where E is an encryption function; x cannot be computed in polynomial time.”

    From IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

  • One-way accumulators were proposed by Benaloh and Mare and are based on the RSA assumption.

    “One-way accumulators were proposed by Benaloh and Mare [11] and are based on RSA assumption [34].”

    From IoT Expunge: Implementing Verifiable Retention of IoT Data (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • MIT Lab for Computer Science and Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1983-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
96-99
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W1996360405
Cited by
13,012
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 445 · 2020: 549 · 2019: 493 · 2018: 498 · 2017: 456 · 2016: 522 · 2015: 557 · 2014: 669 · 2013: 600 · 2012: 600
FWCI
69.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Computer Science and Engineering
Keywords
public-key cryptography, digital signatures, RSA encryption, encryption keys, decryption keys, modular exponentiation, integer factorization, email, electronic funds transfer, key distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review