The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantization for decentralized hypothesis testing under communication constraints
Abstract
In a decentralized hypothesis testing network, several peripheral nodes observe an environment and communicate their observations to a central node for the final decision. The presence of capacity constraints introduces theoretical and practical problems. The following problem is addressed: given that the peripheral encoders that satisfy these constraints are scalar quantizers, how should they be designed in order that the central test to be performed on their output indices is most powerful? The scheme is called cooperative design-separate encoding since the quantizers process separate observations but have a common goal; they seek to maximize a system-wide performance measure. The Bhattacharyya distance of the joint index space as such a criterion is suggested, and a design algorithm to optimize arbitrarily many quantizers cyclically is proposed. A simplified version of the algorithm, namely an independent design-separate encoding scheme, where the correlation is either absent or neglected for the sake of simplicity, is outlined. Performances are compared through worked examples.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gray, R. M. (1990) · Readings in Speech Recognition · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-051584-7.50011-5 · Cited by 2,845
Self-citation
Cited by
Distributed detection with multiple sensors I. Fundamentals
Viswanathan, R., & Varshney, P. K. (1997) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.554208 · Cited by 1,066
On Divergences and Informations in Statistics and Information Theory
Liese, F., & Vajda, I. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.881731 · Cited by 593
Universal Decentralized Estimation in a Bandwidth Constrained Sensor Network
Luo, Z.-Q. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.847692 · Cited by 368
Channel-aware distributed detection in wireless sensor networks
Chen, B., Tong, L., & Varshney, P. K. (2006) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2006.1657814 · Cited by 297
Application-specific compression for time delay estimation in sensor networks
Vasudevan, L., Ortega, A., & Mitra, U. (2003) · Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems · doi:10.1145/958491.958520 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Longo, M., Lookabaugh, T. D., & Gray, R. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241-255
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163382065
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantization for decentralized hypothesis testing under communication constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.52470
- The paper
- Longo, M., Lookabaugh, T. D., & Gray, R. M. (1990). Quantization for decentralized hypothesis testing under communication constraints. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.52470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.