The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved rates and asymptotic normality for nonparametric neural network estimators
Abstract
We obtain an improved approximation rate (in Sobolev norm) of r/sup -1/2-/spl alpha//(d+1)/ for a large class of single hidden layer feedforward artificial neural networks (ANN) with r hidden units and possibly nonsigmoid activation functions when the target function satisfies certain smoothness conditions. Here, d is the dimension of the domain of the target function, and /spl alpha//spl isin/(0, 1) is related to the smoothness of the activation function. When applying this class of ANNs to nonparametrically estimate (train) a general target function using the method of sieves, we obtain new root-mean-square convergence rates of Op([n/log(n)]/sup -/(1+2/spl alpha//(d+1))/[4(1+/spl alpha//(d+1))])=op(n/sup -1/4/) by letting the number of hidden units /spl tau//sub n/, increase appropriately with the sample size (number of training examples) n. These rates are valid for i.i.d. data as well as for uniform mixing and absolutely regular (/spl beta/-mixing) stationary time series data. In addition, the rates are fast enough to deliver root-n asymptotic normality for plug-in estimates of smooth functionals using general ANN sieve estimators. As interesting applications to nonlinear time series, we establish rates for ANN sieve estimators of four different multivariate target functions: a conditional mean, a conditional quantile, a joint density, and a conditional density. We also obtain root-n asymptotic normality results for semiparametric model coefficient and average derivative estimators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Efficient Estimation of Models with Conditional Moment Restrictions Containing Unknown Functions
Ai, C., & Chen, X. (2003) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00470 · Cited by 726
Self-citationDouble/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters
Newey, W. K., Hansen, C., Duflo, E., Robins, J., Chernozhukov, V., Demirer, M., & Chetverikov, D. (2017) · doi:10.1920/wp.cem.2017.2817 · Cited by 486
An Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Method for Counterfactual and Synthetic Controls
Chernozhukov, V., Wüthrich, K., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2021.1920957 · Cited by 176
Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Methods for Predictive Machine Learning With Dependent Data
Chernozhukov, V., Wüthrich, K., & Zhu, Y. (2018) · doi:10.1920/wp.cem.2018.1618 · Cited by 57
Artificial intelligence as structural estimation: Deep Blue, Bonanza, and AlphaGo
Igami, M. (2020) · The Econometrics Journal · doi:10.1093/ectj/utaa005 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., & White, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 682-691
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148596757
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved rates and asymptotic normality for nonparametric neural network estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.749011
- The paper
- Chen, X., & White, H. (1999). Improved rates and asymptotic normality for nonparametric neural network estimators. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.749011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.