Cited by 59Statistical Methods and InferenceProbability and Statistical ResearchAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Exact and Robust Conformal Inference Methods for Predictive Machine Learning With Dependent Data

Open access
Chernozhukov, Victor, Wüthrich, Kaspar, Zhu, Yinchu·2018

Abstract

We extend conformal inference to general settings that allow for time series data. Our proposal is developed as a randomization method and accounts for potential serial dependence by including block structures in the permutation scheme. As a result, the proposed method retains the exact, model-free validity when the data are i.i.d. or more generally exchangeable, similar to usual conformal inference methods. When exchangeability fails, as is the case for common time series data, the proposed approach is approximately valid under weak assumptions on the conformity score.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1920/wp.cem.2018.1618

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If residuals from the boosting analysis are not temporally dependent, the exchangeability assumptions required for conformal prediction regions can still apply despite temporal dependence in the multiple time series data.

    “A complication is that the temporal dependence in the multiple time series data violates the requisite exchangeability (Chernozhukov et al., 2018). However, if the residuals from the boosting analysis are not temporally dependent, the exchangeability assumptions can still apply (Berk et al., 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Balasubramanian, V. N., Ho, S.-S., and Vovk, V. (2014). Conformal Prediction for Reliable Machine Learning . Morgan Kaufmann, Boston.
  2. Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A. (2013). Time series: theory and methods . Springer Science & Business Media.
  3. Burnaev, E. and Vovk, V. (2014). Efficiency of conformalized ridge regression. In Conference on Learning Theory , pages 605-622.
  4. Chen, X., Racine, J., and Swanson, N. R. (2001). Semiparametric arx neural-network models with an application to forecasting inflation. IEEE Transactions on neural networks , 12(4):674-683.
  5. Dashevskiy, M. and Luo, Z. (2008). Network traffic demand prediction with confidence. In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2008. IEEE GLOBECOM 2008. IEEE , pages 1-5. IEEE.
  6. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series: theory and methods . Springer Science & Business Media.
  7. Lehmann, E. L. and Romano, J. P. (2005). Testing statistical hypotheses . Springer Science & Business Media.
  8. Papadopoulos, H., Vovk, V., and Gammermam, A. (2007). Conformal prediction with neural networks. In Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2007. ICTAI 2007. 19th IEEE International Conference on , volume 2, pages 388-395. IEEE.
  9. Rubin, D. B. (1984). Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician. The Annals of Statistics , 12(4):1151-1172.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chernozhukov, V., Wüthrich, K., & Zhu, Y.
Publisher
The IFS
Published
2018-03-02
OpenAlex
W2788786250
Cited by
57
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
conformal prediction, time series, serial dependence, block permutation, exchangeability, randomization, predictive inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review