Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Some inequalities for information divergence and related measures of discrimination

Topsoe, F.·2000·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

Inequalities which connect information divergence with other measures of discrimination or distance between probability distributions are used in information theory and its applications to mathematical statistics, ergodic theory, and other scientific fields. We suggest new inequalities of this type, often based on underlying identities. As a consequence, we obtain certain improvements of the well-known Pinsker inequality. Our study depends on two measures of discrimination, called capacitory discrimination and triangular discrimination. The discussion contains references to related research and comparison with other measures of discrimination, e.g., Ali-Silvey-Csiszar (1996, 1966) divergences and, in particular, the Hellinger distance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/18.850703

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Topsoe, F.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2000-07
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
1602-1609
ISSN
0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159902206
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
19.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some inequalities for information divergence and related measures of discrimination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.850703
The paper
Topsoe, F. (2000). Some inequalities for information divergence and related measures of discrimination. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.850703

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.