The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new metric for probability distributions
Open accessAbstract
We introduce a metric for probability distributions, which is bounded, information-theoretically motivated, and has a natural Bayesian interpretation. The square root of the well-known /spl chi//sup 2/ distance is an asymptotic approximation to it. Moreover, it is a close relative of the capacitory discrimination and Jensen-Shannon divergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 36,808
A General Class of Coefficients of Divergence of One Distribution from Another
Ali, S. M., & Silvey, S. D. (1966) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1966.tb00626.x · Cited by 1,205
Liese, F., & Vajda, I. (1987) · Cited by 452
Some inequalities for information divergence and related measures of discrimination
Topsoe, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.850703 · Cited by 325
Cited by
Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome
MetaHIT Consortium (additional members), Arumugam, M., Raes, J., Pelletier, E., Le Paslier, D., Yamada, T., Mende, D. R., Fernandes, G. R., Tap, J., Bruls, T., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09944 · Cited by 7,548
Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods
Hüllermeier, E., & Waegeman, W. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-05946-3 · Cited by 1,834
Distinct behavioural and network correlates of two interneuron types in prefrontal cortex
Kvitsiani, D., Ranade, S., Hangya, B., Taniguchi, H., Huang, J. Z., & Kepecs, A. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12176 · Cited by 516
Integrated Morphoelectric and Transcriptomic Classification of Cortical GABAergic Cells
Gouwens, N. W., Sorensen, S. A., Baftizadeh, F., Budzillo, A., Lee, B. R., Jarsky, T., Alfiler, L., Baker, K., Barkan, E., Berry, K., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057 · Cited by 538
Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendation
Zhang, Y., Feng, F., He, X., Wei, T., Song, C., Ling, G., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3404835.3462875 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Endres, D. M., & Schindelin, J. E.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1858-1860
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132481658
- Cited by
- 1,163
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new metric for probability distributions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.2003.813506
- The paper
- Endres, D. M., & Schindelin, J. E. (2003). A new metric for probability distributions. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2003.813506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.