The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding
Open accessAbstract
We present a general method for determining the capacity of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes under message-passing decoding when used over any binary-input memoryless channel with discrete or continuous output alphabets. Transmitting at rates below this capacity, a randomly chosen element of the given ensemble will achieve an arbitrarily small target probability of error with a probability that approaches one exponentially fast in the length of the code. (By concatenating with an appropriate outer code one can achieve a probability of error that approaches zero exponentially fast in the length of the code with arbitrarily small loss in rate.) Conversely, transmitting at rates above this capacity the probability of error is bounded away from zero by a strictly positive constant which is independent of the length of the code and of the number of iterations performed. Our results are based on the observation that the concentration of the performance of the decoder around its average performance, as observed by Luby et al. in the case of a binary-symmetric channel and a binary message-passing algorithm, is a general phenomenon. For the particularly important case of belief-propagation decoders, we provide an effective algorithm to determine the corresponding capacity to any desired degree of accuracy. The ideas presented in this paper are broadly applicable and extensions of the general method to low-density parity-check codes over larger alphabets, turbo codes, and other concatenated coding schemes are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Convergence behavior of iteratively decoded parallel concatenated codes
ten Brink, S. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/26.957394 · Cited by 2,386
Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices
Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K., & Pan, J.-W. (2020) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.025002 · Cited by 1,543
On the design of low-density parity-check codes within 0.0045 dB of the Shannon limit
Chung, S.-Y., Forney, G. D., Richardson, T. J., & Urbanke, R. (2001) · IEEE Communications Letters · doi:10.1109/4234.905935 · Cited by 1,539
Self-citationForward error correction for 100 G transport networks
Chang, F., Onohara, K., & Mizuochi, T. (2010) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2010.5434378 · Cited by 432
Message Passing Algorithms for Scalable Multitarget Tracking
Meyer, F., Kropfreiter, T., Williams, J. L., Lau, R., Hlawatsch, F., Braca, P., & Win, M. Z. (2018) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2018.2789427 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, T. J., & Urbanke, R. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 599-618
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169732368
- Cited by
- 3,065
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 179.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.910577
- The paper
- Richardson, T. J., & Urbanke, R. L. (2001). The capacity of low-density parity-check codes under message-passing decoding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.910577
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.