The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rademacher penalties and structural risk minimization
Abstract
We suggest a penalty function to be used in various problems of structural risk minimization. This penalty is data dependent and is based on the sup-norm of the so-called Rademacher process indexed by the underlying class of functions (sets). The standard complexity penalties, used in learning problems and based on the VC-dimensions of the classes, are conservative upper bounds (in a probabilistic sense, uniformly over the set of all underlying distributions) for the penalty we suggest. Thus, for a particular distribution of training examples, one can expect better performance of learning algorithms with the data-driven Rademacher penalties. We obtain oracle inequalities for the theoretical risk of estimators, obtained by structural minimization of the empirical risk with Rademacher penalties. The inequalities imply some form of optimality of the empirical risk minimizers. We also suggest an iterative approach to structural risk minimization with Rademacher penalties, in which the hierarchy of classes is not given in advance, but is determined in the data-driven iterative process of risk minimization. We prove probabilistic oracle inequalities for the theoretical risk of the estimators based on this approach as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 · Cited by 39,138
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes
van der Vaart, A. W., & Wellner, J. A. (1996) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2 · Cited by 5,014
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition
Devroye, L., Györfi, L., & Lugosi, G. (1996) · Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 · Cited by 3,274
On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (2015) · Measures of Complexity · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21852-6_3 · Cited by 3,105
On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
Vapnik, V. N., & Chervonenkis, A. Y. (1971) · Theory of Probability & Its Applications · doi:10.1137/1116025 · Cited by 2,448
Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension
Blumer, A., Ehrenfeucht, A., Haussler, D., & Warmuth, M. K. (1989) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/76359.76371 · Cited by 1,839
On the method of bounded differences
McDiarmid, C. (1989) · Surveys in Combinatorics, 1989 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107359949.008 · Cited by 1,425
Weighted sums of certain dependent random variables
Azuma, K. (1967) · Tohoku Mathematical Journal · doi:10.2748/tmj/1178243286 · Cited by 1,084
Cited by
(2006) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262033589.001.0001 · Cited by 4,280
A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection
Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010) · Statistics Surveys · doi:10.1214/09-ss054 · Cited by 3,522
Concentration Inequalities: A Nonasymptotic Theory of Independence
Boucheron, S., Lugosi, G., & Massart, P. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535255.001.0001 · Cited by 1,768
Foundations of Machine Learning
Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10290.001.0001 · Cited by 1,122
Concentration Inequalities and Model Selection
(2007) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48503-2 · Cited by 744
Metadata
- Authors
- Koltchinskii, V.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1902-1914
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087258353
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rademacher penalties and structural risk minimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/18.930926
- The paper
- Koltchinskii, V. (2001). Rademacher penalties and structural risk minimization. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/18.930926
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.