The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lattice-based access control models
Abstract
Lattice-based access control models were developed in the early 1970s to deal with the confidentiality of military information. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, researchers applied these models to certain integrity concerns. Later, application of the models to the Chinese Wall policy, a confidentiality policy unique to the commercial sector, was demonstrated. A balanced perspective on lattice-based access control models is provided. Information flow policies, the military lattice, access control models, the Bell-LaPadula model, the Biba model and duality, and the Chinese Wall lattice are reviewed. The limitations of the models are identified.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The NIST model for role-based access control: towards a unified standard
Sandhu, R., Ferraiolo, D., & Kuhn, R. (2000) · Proceedings of the fifth ACM workshop on Role-based access control · doi:10.1145/344287.344301 · Cited by 877
Self-citationPeters, G. W., & Panayi, E. (2016) · New Economic Windows · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42448-4_13 · Cited by 686
Securing web application code by static analysis and runtime protection
Huang, Y.-W., Yu, F., Hang, C., Tsai, C.-H., Lee, D.-T., & Kuo, S.-Y. (2004) · Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/988672.988679 · Cited by 567
Security models for web-based applications
Joshi, J. B. D., Aref, W. G., Ghafoor, A., & Spafford, E. H. (2001) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359205.359224 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandhu, R. S.
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 9-19
- ISSN
- 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007999111
- Cited by
- 714
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lattice-based access control models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/2.241422
- The paper
- Sandhu, R. S. (1993). Lattice-based access control models. Computer. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.241422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
