The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An introduction evaluating biometric systems
Abstract
On the basis of media hype alone, you might conclude that biometric passwords will soon replace their alphanumeric counterparts with versions that cannot be stolen, forgotten, lost, or given to another person. But what if the actual performance of these systems falls short of the estimates? The authors designed this article to provide sufficient information to know what questions to ask when evaluating a biometric system, and to assist in determining whether performance levels meet the requirements of an application. For example, a low-performance biometric is probably sufficient for reducing-as opposed to eliminating-fraud. Likewise, completely replacing an existing security system with a biometric-based one may require a high-performance biometric system, or the required performance may be beyond what current technology can provide. Of the biometrics that give the user some control over data acquisition, voice, face, and fingerprint systems have undergone the most study and testing-and therefore occupy the bulk of this discussion. This article also covers the tools and techniques of biometric testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Daugman, J. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2003.818350 · Cited by 2,927
Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk
Sorokin, A., & Forsyth, D. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2008.4562953 · Cited by 616
Kakadiaris, I. A., Passalis, G., Toderici, G., Murtuza, M. N., Lu, Y., Karampatziakis, N., & Theoharis, T. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1017 · Cited by 445
The BANCA Database and Evaluation Protocol
Bailly-Bailliére, E., Bengio, S., Bimbot, F., Hamouz, M., Kittler, J., Mariéthoz, J., Matas, J., Messer, K., Popovici, V., Porée, F., et al. (2003) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44887-x_74 · Cited by 423
The Role of the Human Operator in Image-Based Airport Security Technologies
Graves, I., Butavicius, M., MacLeod, V., Heyer, R., Parsons, K., Kuester, N., McCormac, A., Jacques, P., & Johnson, R. (2011) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17764-4_5 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, P. J., Martin, A., Wilson, C. L., & Przybocki, M.
- Venue
- Computer
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 56-63
- ISSN
- 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106256730
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An introduction evaluating biometric systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/2.820040
- The paper
- Phillips, P. J., Martin, A., Wilson, C. L., & Przybocki, M. (2000). An introduction evaluating biometric systems. Computer. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.820040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.