How Iris Recognition Works
Abstract
Algorithms developed by the author for recognizing persons by their iris patterns have now been tested in many field and laboratory trials, producing no false matches in several million comparison tests. The recognition principle is the failure of a test of statistical independence on iris phase structure encoded by multi-scale quadrature wavelets. The combinatorial complexity of this phase information across different persons spans about 249 degrees of freedom and generates a discrimination entropy of about 3.2 b/mm/sup 2/ over the iris, enabling real-time decisions about personal identity with extremely high confidence. The high confidence levels are important because they allow very large databases to be searched exhaustively (one-to-many "identification mode") without making false matches, despite so many chances. Biometrics that lack this property can only survive one-to-one ("verification") or few comparisons. The paper explains the iris recognition algorithms and presents results of 9.1 million comparisons among eye images from trials in Britain, the USA, Japan, and Korea.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects
Unar, J. A., Seng, W. C., & Abbasi, A. (2014) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.01.016 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Zhang, L., Li, L., Yang, A., Shen, Y., & Yang, M. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.04.016 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Iris recognition: analysis of the error rates regarding the accuracy of the segmentation stage
Proença, H., & Alexandre, L. A. (2010) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.03.003 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Gabor wavelets combined with volumetric fractal dimension applied to texture analysis
Zuñiga, A. G., Florindo, J. B., & Bruno, O. M. (2014) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2013.09.023 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Classification of User Movement Data
Arias, P., Kelley, C., Mason, J., Bryant, K., & Roy, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1145/3193025.3193036 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Açıkyıldız, Ç. (2024) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13343 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Daugman, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Daugman, J.
- ORCID
- Daugman, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-30
- ISSN
- 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974821667
- Cited by
- 2,927
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 146 · 2018: 167 · 2017: 170 · 2016: 195 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 211 · 2013: 201 · 2012: 241
- FWCI
- 90.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- iris recognition, biometric identification, phase structure, false match rate, identity verification, eye image analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review