The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance limits in TDR technique by Monte Carlo simulation
Abstract
This paper researches the performance limits on the estimation of the electromagnetic properties of dielectrics with characteristic times of up to 10 ps using time domain techniques. Constructions of random values with correlation among those, supporting high-fidelity Monte Carlo simulations, are addressed. Precision of the magnitudes under test is obtained, this result is required to evaluate the optimal method. It is shown how a simulated noise restricted to the system bandwidth is sufficient to characterise the errors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ' worst-case ' amplitude error is given by dA = 2 πν THzdt [33] and the dependence of the dynamic range on the timing jitter can be written [37]”
From Terahertz-time domain spectrometer with 90 dB peak dynamic range (2014) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“In this section, we are going to discuss the effect of jitter noise, which has an equally significant impact on the attainable SNR level [25, 29, 32, 33].”
From Terahertz-time domain spectrometer with 90 dB peak dynamic range (2014) · cites this paper as [33]
In the citing paper
“These sources include laser intensity fluctuation [9-11], optical and electronic noise [12,13], delay line stage jitter [14], registration noise [15], and so on.”
From Uncertainty in terahertz time-domain spectroscopy measurement (2008) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1994) · Cited by 15,411
The Fourier Transform and Its Applications
Bracewell, R. N., & Kahn, P. B. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1973431 · Cited by 5,775
The fluctuation-dissipation theorem
Kubo, R. (1966) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/29/1/306 · Cited by 5,141
Information, transmission, modulation and noise
Varshney, P. K. (1981) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1981.12220 · Cited by 356
Constructions of particular random processes
Johnson, G. E. (1994) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.265353 · Cited by 126
Deconvolution of time domain waveforms in the presence of noise
Nahman, N. S. (1981) · doi:10.6028/nbs.tn.1047 · Cited by 116
Time domain characterization of lossy arbitrary characteristic impedance transmission lines
Ferrari, P., Fléchet, B., & Angénieux, G. (1994) · IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters · doi:10.1109/75.294284 · Cited by 37
Analysis of signals from superposed relaxation processes
Link, N., Bauer, S., & Ploss, B. (1991) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.348634 · Cited by 22
Direct deconvolution signal in time domain reflectometry
Artacho, J. M., Forniés-Marquina, J. M., Letosa, J., et al. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/20.376341 · Cited by 18
Self-citationA numerical study of dielectric measurements using single-reflection time-domain reflectometry
Arcone, S. A. (1986) · Journal of Physics E Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1088/0022-3735/19/6/011 · Cited by 16
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fundamentals of Measurement in Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy
Withayachumnankul, W., & Naftaly, M. (2014) · Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves · doi:10.1007/s10762-013-0042-z · Cited by 288
Terahertz-time domain spectrometer with 90 dB peak dynamic range
Vieweg, N., Rettich, F., Deninger, A., Roehle, H., Dietz, R., Göbel, T., & Schell, M. (2014) · Journal of Infrared Millimeter and Terahertz Waves · doi:10.1007/s10762-014-0085-9 · Cited by 203
“The “worst-case” amplitude error is given by dA= 2πνTHzdt [33] and the dependence of the dynamic range on the timing jitter can be written [37]”
BackgroundUncertainty in terahertz time-domain spectroscopy measurement
Withayachumnankul, W., Fischer, B. M., Lin, H., & Abbott, D. (2008) · Journal of the Optical Society of America B · doi:10.1364/josab.25.001059 · Cited by 181
Error propagation for the transformation of time domain into frequency domain
Fornies-Marquina, J. M., Letosa, J., Garcia-Gracia, M., & Artacho, J. M. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · doi:10.1109/20.582534 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Letosa, J., Garcia-Gracia, M., Fornies-Marquina, J. M., & Artacho, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 958-961
- ISSN
- 0018-9464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101776063
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
- Keywords
- time domain reflectometry, performance bounds, correlated random variables, Monte Carlo simulation, measurement noise, system bandwidth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
