The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Textural features corresponding to textural properties
Abstract
Five properties of texture, namely, coarseness, contrast, business, complexity, and texture strength, are given conceptual definitions in terms of spatial changes in intensity. These conceptual definitions are then approximated in computational forms. In comparison with human perceptual measurements, the computational measures have shown good correspondences in the rank ordering of ten natural textures. The extent to which the measures approximate visual perception was investigated in the form of texture similarity measurements. These results were also encouraging, although not as good as in the rank ordering of the textures. The differences may be due to the complex mechanism of human usage of multiple cues. Improved classification results were obtained using the above features as compared with two existing texture analysis techniques. The application of the features in agricultural land-use classification is considered.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zwanenburg, A., Vallières, M., Abdalah, M. A., Aerts, H. J. W. L., Andrearczyk, V., Apte, A., Ashrafinia, S., Bakas, S., Beukinga, R. J., Boellaard, R., et al. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020191145 · Cited by 4,177
Bakas, S., Akbari, H., Sotiras, A., Bilello, M., Rozycki, M., Kirby, J. S., Freymann, J. B., Farahani, K., & Davatzikos, C. (2017) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.117 · Cited by 3,049
Describing Textures in the Wild
Cimpoi, M., Maji, S., Kokkinos, I., Mohamed, S., & Vedaldi, A. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.461 · Cited by 2,438
Mayerhoefer, M. E., Materka, A., Langs, G., Häggström, I., Szczypiński, P., Gibbs, P., & Cook, G. (2020) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.222893 · Cited by 1,777
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?
Davnall, F., Yip, C. S. P., Ljungqvist, G., Selmi, M., Ng, F., Sanghera, B., Ganeshan, B., Miles, K. A., Cook, G. J., & Goh, V. (2012) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6 · Cited by 878
Metadata
- Authors
- Amadasun, M., & King, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1264-1274
- ISSN
- 0018-9472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019090719
- Cited by
- 1,148
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Textural features corresponding to textural properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/21.44046
- The paper
- Amadasun, M., & King, R. (1989). Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.44046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
