Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 767

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events

Kinahan, P.E., Rogers, J.G.·1989·IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

Abstract

The authors present the results of testing an algorithm for three-dimensional image reconstruction that uses all gamma-ray coincidence events detected by a PET (positron emission tomography) volume imaging scanner. By using two iterations of an analytic filter-backprojection method, the algorithm is not constrained by the requirement of a spatially invariant detector point spread function, which limits normal analytic techniques. Removing this constraint allows the incorporation of all detected events, regardless of orientation, which improves the statistical quality of the final reconstructed image.>

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/23.34585

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 767

Metadata

Authors
Kinahan, P. E., & Rogers, J. G.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
Published
1989-02
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
964-968
ISSN
  • 0018-9499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1578
OpenAlex
W2159081727
Cited by
767
References
0
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/23.34585
The paper
Kinahan, P. E., & Rogers, J. G. (1989). Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.34585

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.