The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel
Abstract
The performances of several signal-to noise ratio (SNR) estimation techniques reported in the literature are compared to identify the "best" estimator. The SNR estimators are investigated by the computer simulation of baseband binary phase-shift keying (PSK) signals in real additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) and baseband 8-PSK signals in complex AWGN. The mean square error is used as a measure of performance. In addition to comparing the relative performances, the absolute levels of performance are also established; the simulated performances are compared to a published Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for real AWGN and a CRB for complex AWGN that is derived here. Some known estimator structures are modified to perform better on the channel of interest. Estimator structures for both real and complex channels are examined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics
Popescu, A. C., & Farid, H. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30114-1_10 · Cited by 447
Cognitive Radio Techniques Under Practical Imperfections: A Survey
Sharma, S. K., Bogale, T. E., Chatzinotas, S., Ottersten, B., Le, L. B., & Wang, X. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2452414 · Cited by 221
Exposing image splicing with inconsistent local noise variances
Pan, X., Zhang, X., & Lyu, S. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP) · doi:10.1109/iccphot.2012.6215223 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Pauluzzi, D. R., & Beaulieu, N. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Communications
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1681-1691
- ISSN
- 0090-6778 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145614561
- Cited by
- 841
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/26.871393
- The paper
- Pauluzzi, D. R., & Beaulieu, N. C. (2000). A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel. IEEE Transactions on Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.871393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.