The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Discrete-Time Signal Processing
Oppenheim, A. V., & Schafer, R. W. (1989) · Cited by 11,775
The JPEG still picture compression standard
Wallace, G. K. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/30.125072 · Cited by 2,851
Cox, I. (2002) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.1494075 · Cited by 2,289
Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermarking
Katzenbeisser, S., & Petitcolas, F. A. P. (1999) · Cited by 1,895
Mendel, J. M. (1991) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.75086 · Cited by 1,810
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.
(1921) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/31.121.133 · Cited by 1,465
Digital Bispectral Analysis and Its Applications to Nonlinear Wave Interactions
Kim, Y. C., & Powers, E. J. (1979) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/tps.1979.4317207 · Cited by 887
A comparison of SNR estimation techniques for the AWGN channel
Pauluzzi, D. R., & Beaulieu, N. C. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/26.871393 · Cited by 841
Digital watermarking for telltale tamper proofing and authentication
Kundur, D., & Hatzinakos, D. (1999) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.771070 · Cited by 531
Cited by
Digital Camera Identification From Sensor Pattern Noise
Luka, J., Fridrich, J., & Goljan, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2006.873602 · Cited by 1,328
Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview
Verdoliva, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.3002101 · Cited by 979
Determining Image Origin and Integrity Using Sensor Noise
Chen, M., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M., & Lukas, J. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2007.916285 · Cited by 893
Noiseprint: A CNN-Based Camera Model Fingerprint
Cozzolino, D., & Verdoliva, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2916364 · Cited by 499
Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Popescu, A. C., & Farid, H.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2004
- Pages
- 128-147
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W1515615411
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-540-30114-1_10
- The paper
- Popescu, A. C., & Farid, H. (2004). Statistical Tools for Digital Forensics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30114-1_10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
