Cited by 103Plasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsVacuum and Plasma ArcsGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

Particle-in-cell plus direct simulation Monte Carlo (PIC-DSMC) approach for self-consistent plasma-gas simulations

Serikov, V.V., Kawamoto, S., Nanbu, K.·1999·IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science

Abstract

The particle-in-cell (PIC) and direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) approaches have been combined into a PIC-DSMC model for self-consistent simulations of low-temperature collisional plasmas and the background gas. This novel approach is based on the weighting collision simulation scheme allowing for disparate number densities and time scales of different species. The applicability of the developed algorithm is illustrated by simulations of one-dimensional direct current and two-dimensional magnetron sputtering discharges in argon. An appreciable effect of the energetic discharge species on the density, temperature, and flow field of the background gas shows the importance of the coupled plasma-gas simulation for such technologies as sputtering, dry etching, plasma enhanced vapor deposition, etc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/27.799817

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The production of multiply charged ions from different species at high densities increases computational time, necessitating numerical tricks.

    “Moreover, the production of multiply charged ions from different species induced by the high-voltage [for example chlorine and carbon ions for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) used as propellant for PPT 67 ] at very high densities leads to an obvious increase of the computational time, making it necessary to reduce the simulation cost with the usual numerical tricks cited above 66 .”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Numerical tricks (enlarged vacuum permittivity, reduced ion mass, thruster size scaling) are still used in many simulations to reduce computational time.

    “Nevertheless, numerical tricks (e.g. enlarged vacuum permittivity and/or reduction of ion mass or thruster size scaling) are still used in many simulations to reduce the computational time (see Refs. 59-64 for E × B thrusters, and Refs. 65-67 for PATs).”

    From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serikov, V. V., Kawamoto, S., & Nanbu, K.
Affiliations
  • Nippon Sheet Glass (Japan) (JP)
  • Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku University (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science
Published
1999
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1389-1398
ISSN
0093-3813 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149577047
Cited by
103
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Vacuum and Plasma Arcs
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Keywords
particle-in-cell simulation, direct simulation Monte Carlo, argon plasma, plasma-gas interaction, dry etching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review