The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparative study of permanent magnet and switched reluctance motors for high-performance fault-tolerant applications
Abstract
Switched reluctance machines (SRMs) have been extensively researched for high performance aerospace applications because of their inherent fault tolerance. Recent work by the authors suggests that with careful design a similar degree of fault tolerance may be achieved with a permanent magnet machine (PM) at a significantly higher torque density than its SRM counterpart. This latter suggestion is of crucial importance in high performance applications, such as aerospace, where a low mass is essential. This paper is concerned with reporting measured results from a fault tolerant PM machine, and using these results to examine the relative merits of SR and PM technology for this application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Critical Review of Flywheel Energy Storage System
Olabi, A. G., Wilberforce, T., Abdelkareem, M. A., & Ramadan, M. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14082159 · Cited by 215
Baudart, F., Dehez, B., Matagne, E., Telteu-Nedelcu, D., Alexandre, P., & Labrique, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2011.2170393 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Jack, A. G., Mecrow, B. C., & Haylock, J. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 889-895
- ISSN
- 0093-9994 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976149175
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative study of permanent magnet and switched reluctance motors for high-performance fault-tolerant applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/28.511646
- The paper
- Jack, A. G., Mecrow, B. C., & Haylock, J. A. (1996). A comparative study of permanent magnet and switched reluctance motors for high-performance fault-tolerant applications. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/28.511646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
