Cited by 256Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Effects of compression on soft tissue optical properties

Chan, E.K., Sorg, B., Protsenko, D., O'Neil, M., Motamedi, M., Welch, A.J.·1996·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics

Abstract

Tissue optical properties are necessary parameters for prescribing light dosimetry in photomedicine. In many diagnostic or therapeutic applications where optical fiber probes are used, pressure is often applied to the tissue to reduce index mismatch and increase light transmittance. In this paper, we have measured in vitro optical properties as a function of pressure with a visible-IR spectrophotometer. A spectral range of 400-1800 mm with a spectral resolution of 5 nm was used for all measurements. Skin specimens of a Hispanic donor and two Caucasian donors were obtained from the tissue bank. Bovine aorta and sclera, and porcine sclera came from a local slaughter house. Each specimen, sandwiched between microscope slides, was compressed by a spring-loaded apparatus. Then diffuse reflectance and transmittance of each sample were measured at no load and at approximately 0.1, 1, and 2 kgf/cm/sup 2/. Under compression, tissue thicknesses were reduced up to 78%. Generally speaking, the reflectance decreased while the overall transmittance increased under compression. The absorption and reduced scattering coefficients were calculated using the inverse adding doubling method. Compared with the no-load controls, there was an increase in absorption and scattering coefficients among most of the compressed specimens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/2944.577320

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 256

Authors
Chan, E. K., Sorg, B., Protsenko, D., O'Neil, M., Motamedi, M., & Welch, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics
Published
1996
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
943-950
ISSN
1077-260X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157428768
Cited by
256
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
tissue compression, optical transmittance, diffuse reflectance, absorption coefficient, reduced scattering coefficient, skin, sclera, aorta, optical fiber probe, light dosimetry, photomedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review