The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partition testing does not inspire confidence (program testing)
Abstract
Theoretical models are used to study partition testing in the abstract and to describe the circumstances under which it should perform well at failure detection. Partition testing is shown to be more valuable when the partitions are narrowly based on expected failures and there is a good chance that failures occur. It is concluded that for gaining confidence from successful tests, partition testing as usually practiced has little value.>
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valiant, L. G. (1984) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1968.1972 · Cited by 3,279
Myers, G. J., Sandler, C., & Badgett, T. (1979) · Cited by 793
An Evaluation of Random Testing
Duran, J. W., & Ntafos, S. C. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1984.5010257 · Cited by 684
Toward a theory of test data selection
Goodenough, J. B., & Gerhart, S. L. (1975) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/390016.808473 · Cited by 514
Toward a theory of test data selection
Goodenough, J. B., & Gerhart, S. L. (1975) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1975.6312836 · Cited by 320
Theories of Program Testing and the Application of Revealing Subdomains
Weyuker, E. J., & Ostrand, T. J. (1980) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.1980.234485 · Cited by 223
Hamlet, R. G. (1987) · Information Processing Letters · doi:10.1016/0020-0190(87)90088-3 · Cited by 80
Principles of computer programming : a mathematical approach
Mills, H. D., Basili, V. R., Gannon, J. D., & Hamlet, R. D. (1987) · Allyn and Bacon eBooks · Cited by 63
Princples of Computer Programming
Mills, H. D. (1987) · Allyn & Bacon, Inc. eBooks · Cited by 20
Valiant, L. G. (2026) · Foundations of Computation and Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/3749740.3749746
Cited by
Software unit test coverage and adequacy
Zhu, H., Hall, P. A. V., & May, J. H. R. (1997) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/267580.267590 · Cited by 1,247
Operational profiles in software-reliability engineering
Musa, J. D. (1993) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.199724 · Cited by 765
(2000) · doi:10.1145/351240.351266 · Cited by 753
A taxonomy of model‐based testing approaches
Utting, M., Pretschner, A., & Legeard, B. (2012) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.456 · Cited by 632
Combination testing strategies: a survey
Grindal, M., Offutt, J., & Andler, S. F. (2005) · Software Testing, Verification and Reliability · doi:10.1002/stvr.319 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamlet, D., & Taylor, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1402-1411
- ISSN
- 0098-5589 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980818933
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partition testing does not inspire confidence (program testing). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/32.62448
- The paper
- Hamlet, D., & Taylor, R. (1990). Partition testing does not inspire confidence (program testing). IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/32.62448
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.